“大思政”格局下高等体育院校课程思政的思考与探索——以北京体育大学为例

Exploration of Curriculum-based Ideological and Political Education in Sport Universities from the Perspective of“General Ideological and Political Education”--Taking Beijing Sport University as an Example

课程思政是新时期高等体育院校践行育人初心使命的关键抓手。运用文献资料法和个案研究法,结合国家课程思政建设相关要求及北京体育大学生动实践,分析了“大思政”格局下高等体育院校开展课程思政工作的现实意义、内在优势、实施路径。研究认为:高等体育院校课程思政工作是构建“大思政”格局的关键一环,对提升学校人才培养质量、促进学校高质量发展、创新三全育人机制至关重要;高等体育院校要善于整合课程育人资源,以深挖运动项目思政元素、用好冠军师资示范效应、弘扬红色校园文化作为课程思政工作的着力点;高等体育院校应通过加强课程思政顶层设计、打造课程思政协同教学团队、建设“通识-专业”优质课程群、融通课内外教学场域、完善评价标准和反馈机制等路径持续增强课程思政实施效果。

Curriculum-based ideological and political education is a vital tool for sport universities to carry out their original mission of educating people in the new era.By using the methods of literature review and case study,combined with the national policy,and the practice of Beijing Sport University,this paper analyzes the practical significance,advantages,and implementation paths of curriculum-based ideological and political education in sport universities from the perspective of“General Ideological and Political Education”.Conclusions:the research holds that the ideological and political education at sport universities is a key part of developing the“General Ideological and Political Education”pattern,which is very important for improving the quality of personnel training,promoting the high-quality development of schools,and innovating the three-comprehensive education mechanism.Sport Universities should be good at integrating curriculum education resources,and take the ideological and political elements of sports,make good use of the demonstration effect of champion teachers,and promote the red campus culture as the focus of ideological and political education in the curriculum;sport universities should continue to enhance the implementation effect of integrating ideological and political education into the curriculum by strengthening the top-level design,building a collaborative teaching team,developing high-quality“general-professional”courses,integrating teaching fields,and improving evaluation standards and feedback mechanisms.