海德格尔与舍勒关于价值的思想交锋

Ideological Confrontation of Martin Heidegger and Max Scheler about Value

在其论及价值的文字中,海德格尔表现出一种消解"价值"的印象。其实,海德格尔关于价值是物的现成的规定性、价值是"起作用"的理解,以及对道德善恶的阐释,仅仅关涉事物价值,他并没有在价值的丰富性方面继续进行思考。海德格尔是在最广泛、最深刻、最原初的意义上讨论存在的,在他那里,存在已不是物之存在,更不是物的价值之存在。相比较而言,与海德格尔的个人关系及其思想关联都很密切的舍勒,对价值本质的独特性、价值类型的丰富性以及价值比较的级序性等等进行了充分的揭示。对二人关于价值的思想交锋进行重构,也许可以对海德格尔消解"价值"的误解构成一种"消解",即,海德格尔并没有完全或坚决地消解"价值",他只是反对说"价值之在"而已。

Heidegger seems to erode"value"in related descriptions.In fact,Heidegger’s claim that value would be determinate characteristics which a Thing possesses,his understanding of that value is validity,and his explanation of moral good and evil are only related to the value of things,without continue thinking about the diversity of value.Heidegger discusses Being in the most extensive,profound and original sense,where Being is no longer the existence of things,let alone the existence of the value of things.By comparison,Scheler,who is closely related to Heidegger both in interpersonal interaction and thinking pattern,fully reveals the uniqueness of value essence,the diversity of value type and the order of value comparison.The reconstruction of the two philosophers’ideological confrontation about value may"erode"the misunderstanding of Heidegger’s erosion of"value",that is,Heidegger has not completely or resolutely eroded"value",and he just opposes"Being of values".