期刊文献+

渤海国大祚荣族属的探讨 被引量:1

Re-textual Criticism about the Ethnicity of Da Zuorong in Bohai State
原文传递
导出
摘要 渤海国建国者大祚荣的族属问题是中外渤海史学界长期争论的问题之一,以往学术界的观点分两类:第一类观点认为渤海国大祚荣族属是靺鞨人,又分粟末靺鞨人,白山靺鞨人,渤海靺鞨人三说;第二类观点认为大祚荣族属是高句丽人[1]。最近又有学者发表《大祚荣族属新考》一文,提出大祚荣父子为契丹人,并推出"渤海国内契丹人居于主导地位,致其国俗也类’契丹’"[2],与契丹大贺氏有理论上的渊源[3]。 The ethnicity of Da Zuorong,the founder of Bohai State,has long been one of the controversial issues in the field of Bohai history at home and abroad.According to a more recent study,Da Zuorong and his father were Khitans,and the Khitan was in a dominant position in Bohai State,so that the national customs in Bohai were also like“Khitan”.They had a theoretical origin from Dahe family name of Khitan.The new point is not very convincing and it related to the interpretation of basic historical data.This paper cardings and analyzes the literature about the origin and tributary of Bohai.Then it deems that“Mojie”is the official title of“Mohe”in Tang Dynasty.Because of printing,collating and rewriting,“Mojie”was gradually named“Mohe”in Song Dynasty.It made a correct interpretation of“Yanghe”and“Limo”with the historical context by Cui Zhiyuan.Non-Khitan can also get Sheli official by means of donation or others.Da Zuorong and his father are Sumo-Mohers,and the founder’s ethnicity of Bohai State is Mohe,rather than others.
作者 冯恩学 王春委 FENG En-xue;WANG Chun-wei
出处 《边疆考古研究》 2019年第2期241-245,共5页 Research of China's Frontier Archaeology
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大委托项目成果(项目号:16JZDW004)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

共引文献41

同被引文献28

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部