期刊文献+

两种手术方法治疗唇裂鼻畸形的疗效比较 被引量:1

Two surgical options for cleft lip deformity:comparison of the treatment efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较两种手术方法治疗唇裂鼻畸形的治疗效果。方法:收集2016年12月至2017年12月在我院手术治疗的单侧唇裂鼻畸形患者124例,其中行翼软骨环状结构修复及整体旋转复位术患者62例为观察组,行开放式唇裂鼻畸形整形术患者62例为对照组,比较两组的修复效果及并发症发生情况。结果:观察组和对照组术后外观优良率分别为96.77%(60/62)、95.16%(59/62),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.794)。两组患者术后患侧鼻孔纵径至中线距离、患侧鼻翼外侧至中线距离与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。术后两组患者患侧与健侧鼻孔纵径至中线距离、患侧与健侧鼻翼外侧至中线距离组内比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P=1.000)。观察组与对照组并发症发生率分别为4.84%(3/62)、6.45%(4/62),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两种手术方法治疗单侧唇裂鼻畸形临床疗效基本接近。 Objective:To compare the treatment efficacy with of two surgical options for cleft lip nasal deformity(CLND).Methods:Included in this study were a total of 124 patients with unilateral CLND who underwent surgery in our hospital between December 2016 and December 2017.Among them,62 patients who underwent repair of alar cartilaginous ring and Millard’s surgery were assigned to the study group,and another 62 who underwent open plastic surgery for CLND were assigned to the control group.The outcomes of repair and the complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The rate of cosmetic excellence in the study group and the control group were 96.77%(60/62)and 95.16%(59/62),respectively,with no significant difference between the groups(P=0.794).After surgery,there were significant differences in the distance from the longitudinal axis of ipsilateral nostril to the midline and the distance from lateral side of ipsilateral alar to the midline within each group compared with baseline(bothP<0.001).There was no significant difference in the distance from longitudinal axis of nostril to the midline between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides,or in the distance from lateral side of alar to the midline between ipsilateral and contralateral sides,within either group(allP=1.000).The complication rates in the study group and the control group were 4.84%(3/62)and 6.45%(4/62),respectively,with no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of these two surgical methods appears overall comparable in treatment of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity.
作者 谢诗涓 熊莺 王培蕾 Xie Shijuan;Xiong Ying;Wang Peilei(Shanghai Shuangzi Medical Aesthetics Clinic,Shanghai 200000;Nanhai Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University,Foshan,Guangdong 528244;Hunan Medical College,Huaihua,Hunan 418000,China)
出处 《广州医科大学学报》 2019年第4期63-65,共3页 Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical University
关键词 唇裂鼻畸形 外科 整形 修复效果 cleft lip nasal deformity surgery,plastic surgery repair outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献72

  • 1李森恺,徐军,李养群,马晓冰,穆兰花,刘元波,李式瀛,黄继贤,刘忠祥,郭秀英.单侧唇裂继发畸形的解剖学修复[J].中华整形烧伤外科杂志,1994,10(1):62-65. 被引量:49
  • 2杨斌,赵敏,熊斌,刘珍君.齿槽嵴裂植骨修复后的临床观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2005,21(9):554-555. 被引量:9
  • 3郭同荣,徐启飞.应用“L”型硅胶假体与膨体聚四氟乙烯补片修复单侧唇裂鼻畸形17例报道[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(1):104-106. 被引量:9
  • 4濮哲铭,杨群,汪希,钱云良.复合假体在支架结构缺损的鼻畸形治疗中的应用[J].中国实用美容整形外科杂志,2006,17(3):169-170. 被引量:6
  • 5MEYER-MARCOTTY P,STELIZIG-EISENHAUER A.Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate[J].J Orofac Orthop,2009,70(3):224-236.
  • 6WANG T D.Secondary thinoplasty in unilateral cleft nasal deformity[J].Clin Plast Surg,2010,37(2):383-387.
  • 7JUNG D H,CHANG G U,BAEK S H,et al.Subnasale flap for correction of columella base deviation in secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity[J].J Craniofac Surg,2010,21(1):146-150.
  • 8THOMAS C.Primary rhinoplasty by open approach with repair of unilateral complete cleft lip[J].J Cruniofac Surg,2009,20(Suppl 2):1711-1714.
  • 9FLORES R L,SAILON A M,CUTHNG C B.A novel cleft rhinoplasty procedure combining an open rhinoplasty with the Dibber and Tajima techniques:a 10-year review[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2009,124(6):2041-2047.
  • 10NAKAMURA N,OKAWACHI T,NISHIHARA K,et al.Surgical technique for secondary correction of unilateral cleft lip-nose deformity:clinical and 3-dimensional observations of preoperative and postoperative nasal forms[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2009,12.

共引文献21

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部