足跟采血与静脉采血筛查新生儿疾病的比较

Comparison of heel blood sampling and vein blood sampling in screening neonatal diseases

目的:探讨足跟采血和静脉采血在筛查新生儿疾病中的效果。方法:2018年5月和6月,我院接纳的新生儿各150例。5月份新生儿采用足跟采血法采血,设置为对照组;6月份新生儿采用大隐静脉采血法采血,设置为观察组。分析两种方法一次性采血成功率、新生儿啼哭时间与耗材消耗量。结果:观察组新生儿一次性采血成功率91.3%,高于对照组的76.7%,啼哭时间(2.1±1.6)min,短于对照组的(5.34±2.62)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组一次性采血器械消耗量低于对照组。结论:采用大隐静脉采集新生儿血标本,采血成功率高,采血时新生儿的痛苦程度小。

Objective: To explore the effect of heel blood collection and vein blood collection in screening neonatal diseases. Methods: In May and June 2018, 150 newborns were admitted to our hospital,respectively. In May, blood was collected from the heel of the newborns, which was set as the control group;in June, blood was collected from the great saphenous vein, which was set as the observation group. The success rate of one-time blood collection, the crying time of the newborn and consumption of consumables were analyzed. Results: The success rate of one-time blood collection was 91.3% in the observation group, which was higher than 76.7% in the control group. The crying time was(2.1±1.6)min, shorter than(5.34±2.62)min in the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P< 0.05). The consumption of disposable blood collection equipment in the observation group was lower than that in the control group. Conclusion: The great saphenous vein can be used to collect the blood samples of the newborn with high success rate and less pain.