摘要
“宋学”本是一个传统经学的概念,具有经学史上分期、分派的意义。在近代以来的学术研究中,陈寅恪首先提出“宋学”,是指宋代的文化。在后来的“宋学”研究中,“宋学”成为了一个史学概念,主要是研究者从史学的角度,尤其是从思想史的角度对宋代儒学做的历史的研究,他们所预设的前提甚至反对的目标,主要是中国哲学史研究领域对宋明理学的研究。思想史和哲学史的“宋学”研究,围绕“宋学第一人”展开的争论,典型地体现出两种不同的视角和方法对于宋代儒学以及理学的不同态度。总结、梳理这两方面的研究,探讨思想史与哲学史两种研究范式各自的来源、功能及其局限,无论对于“宋学”研究,还是对于中国哲学史研究的深入,都是极有裨益的。
Originally the“Song School”referred to a period and a research method in traditional Chinese classics.In modern academia Chen Yinque first proposed the concept of“Song Studies”,which means the study of culture in the Song dynasty.Later“Song Studies”became a historiographical concept,which means scholars studied Confucianism in the Song dynasty by the method of history of thought.This is opposition to the philosophical study of Neo-Confucianism.Song Studies from methods of history and philosophy argued on the topic who was the pioneer in the Song School.The issue typically showed two different methods and perspectives to Confucianism in the Song dynasty and to Neo-Confucianism.It will be beneficial to Song Studies,the study of the history of Chinese philoso phyand the study of Chinese thought,to discuss the effects and limits of the two methods.
出处
《国际儒学(中英文)》
2022年第4期93-102,176,共11页
International Studies on Confucianism
关键词
宋学
理学
儒学
思想史
哲学史
Song School
Song Studies
Neo-Confucianism
Confucianism
history of thought
history of philosophy