刑法中扩张解释的规范构造

Standard Construction of Extended Interpretation in Criminal Law

刑法中的扩张解释存在中日理论界"肯定说"和德国刑法学界"否定说"之不同立场,但双方均认可"文字可能的含义"是刑法解释的界限。建立在"扩张解释"概念上的界限论不同于德国语言学上的界限论。在扩张解释的规范化构造这一中国问题中,扩张解释的存在是立体的,与类推解释的界分也需以实质的"文字可能含义"和形式的"推论形式区别"进行双层考察,在扩张解释规则上应遵循文义阈界的限定、体系的限定、法益衡量选择的限定三重阶层规范化的限缩。

The expanded interpretation of criminal law has different positions in the Chinese and Japanese theoretical circles,"affirmative theory"and the German criminal law academic"negative theory,"but both sides agree that"the possible meaning of words"is the limit of criminal law interpretation.Boundary theory based on the concept of"expanded interpretation"is different from German linguistic boundary theory.In the Chinese problem of the normalized construction of expansion interpretation,the existence of expansion interpretation is threedimensional,and the boundary between analogy interpretation also needs to be double-layered in terms of the substantive"literal meaning"and the form"inference form difference".Expansion interpretation rules should follow the definition of the threshold of meaning,the limitation of the system,and the limitation of the choice of legal interest measurement.