钱锺书论“杜样”之“走样”——《谈艺录·七律杜样》及其误读评析

On Qian Zhongshu’s Discussion on the Variant of “Typical Style of Du Fu’s Qilv”:An Analysis and Comment on Typical Style of Du Fu’s Qilvin Discussing Art Record and Its Misreadings

雄阔高浑、实大声宏的七律"杜样"在后世影响深远,却也逐渐"走样"。《谈艺录·七律杜样》梳理出一份自唐至明的学杜名单,显示了杜样的演变"走样"过程;兼及杜律之韧瘦和生拗两种风格及其接受。钱锺书论杜律三体各有特征和影响,然《钱钟书〈谈艺录〉读本》等钱学或杜诗学的相关阐释或张冠李戴,或本末倒置,混淆不清,也不免"走样"并导致后续的误解。故有必要在细读评析《谈艺录》原文的基础上,一一辨析钱学阐释"走样"之处。

The typical style of Du fu’s Qilv is magnificent,lofty,solid and loud,which has far-reaching influence in later generations,though changing gradually in imitation.Discussing Art Recordsort out a list of learning Du fu’s Qilv from Tang Dynasty to Ming Dynasty,which shows the variant of the typical style,meanwhile the essay also mentions another two styles.In Qian Zhongshu’s exposition,there are three different styles of Du Fu’s Qilv and each has its own influence.Qian Zhongshu’s these comments were somewhat misread,which led to more misunderstandings.Therefore,it is necessary to differentiate and analyze the distortions of the study of Qian on the basis of careful reading and commenting on the original text of Discussing Art Record.