《文心雕龙》“剖情析采,笼圈条贯”辨

The Justification of the “pou qing xi cai” and “long quan tiao guan” of Wen Xin Diao Long

长期以来,学界将《文心雕龙·序志》中的"剖情析采,笼圈条贯"理解为主谓结构,用"剖情析采"来概括《文心雕龙》下篇的内容,将"笼圈条贯"理解为对"剖情析采"的概括和分析。这样的理解有违事实。其实,"剖情析采"指代的是《文心雕龙》中的《情采》篇,"笼圈条贯"指代的是《文心雕龙》中的《镕裁》篇。刘勰将"剖情析采"与"笼圈条贯"并列对举是有原因的,《情采》是对文学创作中情与采之间的辩证关系的理论探讨,《镕裁》是对文学创作中如何合理安排情与采的方法论探讨,两者在内容上具有关联性。学界对"剖情析采"和"笼圈条贯"的误解严重影响了对《文心雕龙》结构的认识,必须予以及时纠正。

For a long time,the"pou qing xi cai"and"long quan tiao guan"of the preface of Wen Xin Diao Long was understood as subjectpredicate structure,the scholars use"pou qing xi cai"to sum up the second half content of Wen Xin Diao Long,understand the"long quan tiao guan"as summary and analysis.This understanding is not true.In fact,"pou qing xi cai"refers to the chapter of the"Qing Cai"of Wen Xin Diao Long,"long quan tiao guan"refers to the chapter of the"Rong Cai"of the Wen Xin Diao Long.Liu Xie has reasons to put the"pou qing xi cai"and the"long quan tiao guan"together,there is a close relationship between"Qing Cai"and"Rong Cai"."Qing Cai"discussed about the dialectical relationship between emotion and literature in the literary creation,while"Rong Cai"discussed about the ways to arrange emotion and literature.The misunderstanding of"pou qing xi cai"and"long quan tiao guan"seriously affected the understanding of the structure of Wen Xin Diao Long,and must be corrected in time.