期刊文献+

逾越民法含义的刑法解释现象研究

Research on Phenomena of Criminal Law Interpretations Exceeding Their Meanings in Civil Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 "逾越民法含义的刑法解释",是指对同一概念或术语,刑法对之做出宽于或者窄于民法含义的解释.刑法解释赋予单位人格的标准极为混乱,对"刺破法人面纱理论"的借鉴过于机械,将财产性利益解释为财物,将"虚拟财产"解释为财物,将含有国有成分的混合所有制公司、企业财产解释为国有财产,将非法债务解释成债务,对"合同"作出与民法不同的解释,将间接经济损失、精神损害排除在损失之外,将部分"相似的注册商标"解释成"相同的注册商标",将冒充专利解释为假冒专利,是其具体体现.逾越民法含义刑法解释现象的出现原因主要包括民法与刑法在核心价值取向上的差异性、民法和刑法对当事人意思自治的态度不同、刑法和民法的立法协调不够等.逾越民法含义刑法解释现象的出现,揭示了刑法和民法之间的关系的演进历程,完全符合辩证法的"否定之否定"规律,其发展遵循"民刑不分"→"民刑分立"→"民刑交融"的趋势. Criminal law interpretations exceeding their meanings in civil law are interpretations that the criminal law interprets the meaning of the same concept or terminology more broadly or narrowly than the meaning in civil law.Its concrete manifestation is as follows:the criteria for giving personality to a unit in criminal law interpretations are extremely confusing,it is too mechanical to draw lessons from the theory of piercing the corporate veil,interpreting property interest as property,the property of mixed ownership companies and enterprises with state-owned components is interpreted as state-owned property,interprets illegal debt into debt,interprets"contract"differently from civil law,exclude indirect economic loss and mental damage from loss,interprets part of"similar registered trademarks"as"identical registered trademarks",interprets"passing off patent"as"counterfeiting patent".The reasons for the phenomenon of criminal law interpretations beyond their meanings in civil law mainly are differences in core value orientation between civil law and criminal law,different attitudes towards party autonomy in civil law and criminal law,insufficient coordination between the lawmaking of criminal law and civil law,etc.The emergence of the phenomenon of criminal law interpretations beyond their meanings in civil law reveals the evolution of the relationship between criminal law and civil law,which fully conforms to the law of negation of negation of dialectics.Its development follows the trend of"no distinction between civil and criminal law","separation of civil and criminal law","integration of civil and criminal law".
作者 陈志军 Chen Zhijun
出处 《刑法论丛》 2019年第4期62-103,共42页 Criminal Law Review
关键词 刑法解释 民法 越权解释 民刑分立 民刑交融 Criminal Law Interpretations Civil Law Interpretation Being Worked out beyond One’s Authority Separation of Civil and Criminal Law Integration Between Civil and Criminal Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献36

  • 1马俊驹,梅夏英.财产权制度的历史评析和现实思考[J].中国社会科学,1999(1):90-105. 被引量:177
  • 2夏朝晖.试论合同诈骗罪[J].法商研究,1997,15(4):78-83. 被引量:49
  • 3[日]前田雅英.刑法总论讲义[M].东京:有斐阁,1998.172.
  • 4[日]山口厚.刑法总论[M].有斐阁,2001..
  • 5高铭暄 马克昌 刑法学.北京大学出版社[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000..
  • 6[德]乔治·恩德勒 李兆雄 陈泽环.经济伦理学大辞典[Z].上海:上海人民出版社,2001..
  • 7[德]汉斯·海因里希·耶赛克 托马斯·魏根特 徐久生.德国刑法教科书[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001..
  • 8[美]约翰·罗尔斯 谢延光.正义论[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1991..
  • 9[德]KarlLarenz 陈爱娥.法学方法论[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1996..
  • 10[日]前田雅英.罪刑法定主义匕实质的构成要件解释[J].现代刑事法(日本),2001,(1):31-31.

共引文献332

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部