期刊文献+

中文版儿童共情商-系统化商量表的初步修订及信效度检验

Validity and Reliability of Children's Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient
下载PDF
导出
摘要 方法:采用整群取样的方法,抽取绍兴地区4~11岁儿童为研究对象,由其家长完成问卷调查.其中,样本1(n=382)进行儿童共情商-系统化商量表项目分析和探索性因素分析,样本2(n=1042)进行儿童共情商-系统化商量表验证性因素分析.在样本2中随机选取2个四年级班级学生(n=79)用于进行间隔2个月的重测信度检验.结果:中文版儿童共情商-系统化商量表共50个条目,模型良好,x2/df=2.78,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.09,GFI=0.88,AGFI=0.86,CFI=0.85,IFI=0.85,TLI=0.83.男生共情分量表上显著低于女生(t=-5.72,p<0.001),系统化分量表上显著高于女生(t=3.46,p<0.001).共情分量表Cronbachα系数为0.89,分半信度为0.81;系统化分量表Cronbachα系数为0.88,分半信度系数0.84.共情分量表重测信度为0.87,系统化分量表重测信度为0.86.结论:中文版儿童共情商-系统化商量表具有良好的效度与信度,可用于中国儿童共情特质与系统化特质的评估. Methods:All the subjects were selected by cluster sampling from children aged 4-11 in Shaoxing.Their Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient were completed with the aid of their parents.Sample 1(n=382)was used for primary exploratory factor analysis,and sample 2(n=1042)for confirmatory factor analysis.All the 2 classes of students(n=79)of sample 2 were randomly selected for retest reliability test at intervals of 2 months.Results:There are 50 items in children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient for Chinese children.The confirmatory factor analysis shows that the structure of the children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient were reasonable(χ2/df=2.78,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.09,GFI=0.88,AGFI=0.86,CFI=0.85,IFI=0.85,TLI=0.83).Compared with the girls,the boys got significantly lower scores in EQ-C(t=-5.72,p<0.001)and significantly higher scores in SQ-C(t=3.46,p<0.001).The Cronbachαcoefficient of the EQ-C was 0.89,the split-half coefficient 0.81,the Cronbachαcoefficient of the SQ-C 0.88,and the split-half coefficient 0.84.The retest reliability coefficient of the EQ-C was 0.87,and the retest reliability coefficient of the SQ-C 0.86.Conclusion:The children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing Empathizing and Systemizing in Chinese culture.
作者 谢敏芳 王瑾钰 陈巍 XIE Minfang;WANG Jinyu;CHEN Wei(Center for Brain,Mind and Education,Shaoxing University,Shaoxing,Zhejiang 312000;School of Teacher Education,Shaoxing University,Shaoxing,Zhejiang 312000)
出处 《绍兴文理学院学报》 2020年第6期10-17,共8页 Journal of Shaoxing University
基金 浙江省教育科学规划项目“镜像神经元发生学视角下的‘天性-教养’之争”(2018SCG140)
关键词 共情商-系统化商量表 效度 信度 empathy quotient and systemizing quotient validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1王磊,郑雪.大学生自我价值感领域权变性量表的编制[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(2):113-119. 被引量:14
  • 2陈丽娜,张明,金志成,赵闪,梅松丽.中小学生感觉寻求量表的编制与应用[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(4):103-108. 被引量:33
  • 3侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.(2004).结构议程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 4Bagozzi R. P. & Heatherton T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to state self- esteem, Structural Equation Modeling, 1 ( 1 ) : 35 - 67.
  • 5Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness of -fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9 ( 1 ) : 78 - 102.
  • 6Bentler P. M. & Chou C. P. (1987). Practical issue in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Reseach, 16 ( 1 ) : 78 - 117.
  • 7Byme, B. M. ( 1994 ). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows : Basic concepts, application, and programming. London: Sage Publications.
  • 8Horn J. L. & McArdle J. J. (1992). Apractical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3 -4) :117 - 144.
  • 9J ensen A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
  • 10Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4) :409 - 426.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部