期刊文献+

城市重点地区规划实施评估的要点与方法探讨——以上海虹桥商务区为例

Points and Methods of Planning Implementation Evaluation in Urban Key Areas:A Case Study of Hongqiao Central Business District
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在城市快速发展过程中,一些重点地区往往在短时间内开发形成,却对城市空间产生长远影响.如何有效评价并指导未来发展,已经成为重要的规划议题.基于上海虹桥商务区项目实践,对比城市总体规划评估和控详规划评估,从对重点地区规划实施评估类型、对象、目的等的认识出发,提出评估要点,包括地区发展脉络全方位的梳理、多维度的评估内容、多视角的评估标准以及覆盖规划、建设、管理的具体评估结论.在技术方法上,提出传统数据与大数据相结合的多源数据运用、数据分析与交互评估相结合的多方参与模式以及现状评估与未来预判相结合的多层次结论的思路与方法. With the rapid development of the city,some urban key areas are often formed in a short time,which will have a long-term impact on urban space.Therefore,how to effectively evaluate and guide urban future development has become an important planning issue.Based on the project practice of Shanghai Hongqiao Central Business District,this paper compares the evaluation of urban master plan with that of detailed control plan.Starting from understanding the types,objects and purposes of the evaluation of the planning implementation in urban key areas,it proposes the points of the evaluation,which include a comprehensive regional development context,multi-dimensional evaluation contents,multi-perspective evaluation criteria and specific evaluation conclusions covering the planning,construction and management.In terms of technical methods,it proposes the multi-source data application combining traditional data and big data,the multi-party participation mode combining data analysis and interactive evaluation,and the multi-level conclusion summary ideas and methods combining current situation evaluation and future prediction.
作者 陆圆圆 LU Yuanyuan
出处 《上海城市规划》 2020年第S01期109-114,共6页 Shanghai Urban Planning Review
关键词 重点地区 规划实施评估 多源数据 虹桥商务区 key area planning implementation evaluation multi-source data Hongqiao Central Business District
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献28

  • 1Krosnick J. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991, 5: 213-36.
  • 2Healey P. Collaborative Planning[M]. London, Macmillan, 1997.
  • 3Davoudi S. Towards a conceptual Framework for evaluating Governance Capacities in European polycentrie Urban Regions, in D Miller and D Patassini(eds), Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis. Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005,pp:277-294.
  • 4Cook T P. Postpositivist Critical Multiplism, in R L Shortland and M M Mark(eds),Social Science and Social Policy, Newbury Park,CA,Sage, 1985: 129-146.
  • 5Bobrow D B and Dryzek J S.Poliey Analysis by Design[M]. Pittsburgh,PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987.
  • 6Alexander ER. Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a PostPostmodernist Perspective[J]. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 2000,19: 242-256.
  • 7Lichfield D.Community Impact Assessment and Planning. The Role of Objectives in Evaluation Design,in H.Voogd(ed), Recent Developments in Evaluation, Groningen Geo Press, 2001:153-74.
  • 8Faludi A. Korthals ARes W. Evaluation Communicative Planning[A]. in D Borri,A Khakee and c Laeirignola(eds),Evaluating Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning,Dordrencht[C], Kluwer: 1997.
  • 9Miller D and Patassini D introduction-Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation, in D Miller and D patassini(eds),Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis, Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation,Aldershot, Ashgate,2005:1-12.
  • 10Lichfield N, Kettle P and White bread M. Evaluation in the Planning Process[M]. Oxford, Pergamon, 1995.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部