期刊文献+

住院扩张型心肌病患者院内和院外预后分析及风险评估系统创建 被引量:1

In-hospital and post-discharge prognosis and prediction scoring system for patients hospitalized with dilated cardiomyopathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 分析住院扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者院内及院外预后,并创建风险评估系统.方法 入选2009年1月至2013年12月在阜外医院心力衰竭病房住院的成人DCM患者,随访至2015年12月或全因死亡或行心脏移植.定义心力衰竭恶化、猝死或脑卒中导致的死亡为心血管原因死亡.危险因素判定采用多变量Cox回归分析方法.结果 共纳入793例患者,其中35例(4.4%)发生院内死亡,院内死亡与入院收缩压(P)≤106 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、血清总胆红素浓度(B)≥34.2μmol/L及血清钠离子浓度(S)<135 mmol/L显著相关(P均<0.01),由此建立PBS评分系统,分为低危(评分=0分)、中危(评分=1或2分)和高危(评分=3分)三组,三组患者院内病死率差异有统计学意义(0.6%、3.5%和29.9%,趋势比较P<0.01).其中701例患者完成随访,中位随访34(18,51)个月后,137例死亡、16例行心脏移植,出院后1年、2年及3年的无心脏移植存活率分别为88.4%、82.3%和78.8%.其中3年内发生心血管原因死亡或心脏移植125例,与入院时年龄(A)<30岁、心力衰竭病史(D)>6个月、红细胞体积分布宽度(D)>13.5%、左心室舒张末期内径(L)>75 mm、右心室前后径(R)>25 mm、出院时收缩压(B)≤106 mmHg、出院未应用血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻断剂(A)及β受体阻滞剂(B)显著相关(P均<0.01),由此建立A2B2D2LR评分系统,分为低危(评分=0或1分)、中危(评分=2或3分)、高危(评分=4或5分)和极高危(评分≥6分)四组,四组患者3年内心血管原因死亡或行心脏移植的发生率差异有统计学意义(分别为1.2%、11.0%、37.5%和66.7%,趋势比较P均<0.01).结论 PBS评分系统及A2B2D2LR评分系统分别能有效预测住院DCM患者院内死亡及出院后3年内发生心血管原因死亡或行心脏移植的风险. Objective To investigate the in-hospital mortality and post-discharge prognosis,and to establish prediction scoring systems for patients hospitalized with dilated cardiomyopathy(DCM).Methods Adult patients hospitalized with DCM in Heart Failure Care Unit,Fuwai Hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 were enrolled and followed up to December 2015 or until all-cause death or heart transplantation(HTx).Cardiovascular(CV)death was defined as death from worsening heart failure,sudden death,or stroke.Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of prognosis.Results A total of 793 patients were enrolled and 35 died during hospitalization(in-hospital mortality rate of 4.4%),which was significantly associated with systolic blood pressure(P)≤106 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),serum total bilirubin(B)≥34.2μmol/L and serum sodium(S)<135 mmol/L on admission(all P value<0.01).Subsequently,we established the PBS scoring system and patients were divided into low risk(score=0),moderate risk(score=1 or 2)and high risk(score=3)with inhospital mortality rates of 0.6%,3.5%and 29.9%(P<0.01 for trend),respectively.During a median period of 34(18,51)months for 701 patients with follow-up after discharge,137 died and other 16 underwent HTx.Transplant-free survival rate at 1-year,2-year and 3-year was 88.4%,82.3%and 78.8%,respectively.Within the 3-year follow-up after discharge,125 patients suffered from CV death or underwent HTx,which was significantly associated with age(A)<30 years,symptom duration of heart failure(D)>6 months,red cell distribution width(D)>13.5%,left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(L)>75 mm,right ventricular diameter(R)>25 mm on admission,systolic blood pressure(B)≤106 mmHg,non-administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker(A)or beta blocker(B)at discharge(all P value<0.01).Thus,we established the A2B2D2LR scoring system and divided patients into low risk(score=0 or 1),moderate risk(score=2 or 3),high risk(score=4 or 5)and extremely high risk(score=6 or greater)with incidence rates of CV death or HTx within 3 years after discharge of 1.2%,11.0%,37.5%and 66.7%(P<0.01 for trend),respectively.Conclusion The PBS scoring system and A2B2D2LR scoring system can effectively predict the risk of in-hospital mortality and CV death or HTx within the 3-year follow-up after discharge.
作者 邹长虹 黄燕 周琼 安涛 张荣成 吕蓉 张宇辉 张健 Zou Changhong;Huang Yan;Zhou Qiong;An Tao;Zhang Rongcheng;Lyu Rong;Zhang Yuhui;Zhang Jian(Heart Failure Center,Fuwai Hospital,National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,167 Beilishi Road,Beijing 100037,China)
出处 《中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文)》 2017年第2期93-97,共5页 Chinese Journal of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy
基金 '十二·五'国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAI11B02,心力衰竭项目).
关键词 心肌病 扩张型 预后 危险性评估 Cardiomyopathy,dilated Prognosis Risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献73

  • 1王志民,邹玉宝,宋雷,马爱群,刘唐威,谷惠敏,卢赛兰,武鹏翥,孙兆明,何国宝,张卫,张颖,沈丽,蔡玉岭,甄一松,刘延玲,惠汝太.超声心动图检查调查8080例成人肥厚型心肌病患病率[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1090-1094. 被引量:59
  • 2张寄南,曹克将.肥厚型心肌病诊断与治疗——美国心脏病学学会/欧洲心脏病学学会、美国心脏病协会专家共识导读[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(6):491-494. 被引量:35
  • 3廖玉华,袁璟.扩张型心肌病分子免疫治疗靶点的研究进展[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(17):1158-1160. 被引量:8
  • 4Richardson P,McKenna W,Bristow M,et al.Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies.Circulation,1996,93(5):841-842.
  • 5Maron BJ,Towbin JA,Thiene G,et al.Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies:an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology,Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention.Circulation,2006,113(14):1807-1816.
  • 6Elliott PM,Mckenna WJ.Natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.[EB/OL][2006-8-2].http://www.utdol.com/utd/content/topic.do?topicKey=myoperic/11502&type=A&selectedTitle=4~58.
  • 7Cooper LT.Definition and classification of the cardiomyopathies.[EB/OL][2006-8-2].http://www.utdol.com.beckerproxy.wustl.edu/applica.../6085&type=A&selectedTitle=2~5.
  • 8McKenna WJ.Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.[EB/OL][2006-8-2].http://www.utdol.com/utd/content/topic.do?topicKey=myoperic/9673&type=A&selectedTitle=3~58.
  • 9Poliac LC,Barron ME,Maron BJ.Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Anesthesiology,2006,104(1):183-192.
  • 10Maron BJ,Seidman JG,Seidman CE.Proposal for contemporary screening strategies in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44(11):2125-2132.

共引文献5174

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部