期刊文献+

神经内科出院病例的重点专科DRGs评价分析 被引量:1

Evaluation and Analysis of DRGs in Key Specialties of Discharged Cases in Neurology Department
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过重点专科DRGs评价指标分析神经内科出院病例的指标差距和存在不足,为专科管理和改进提供数据支持.方法 分析某医院2017年1月1日-12月31日出院的神经内科病案9460份,将神经内科临床重点专科评价结果 细化分解到医院内部科室,计算各科室的病例数、CMI和时间费用消耗指数等DRGs指标的差距.结果神经内科出院病例涵盖DRGs诊断相关分组34组,CMI值1.24,低于全院病例水平;时间消耗指数0.84,费用消耗指数0.95,高于全院病例水平.结论 神经内科住院患者的住院天数、医疗费用与重点专科水平尚有差距,病种结构有待完善. Objectives To analyze the index gap and deficiency of discharge cases in neurology department through the evaluation index of DRGs in key specialties,so as to provide data support for the management and improvement of specialties.Methods 9,460 cases of neurological diseases discharged from a hospital from January 1st,2017 to December 31st,2017 were analyzed,and the evaluation results of key clinical specialties of neurology were decomposed into internal departments of the hospital,and the differences of cases,CMI,time cost consumption index and other DRGs indexes in each department were calculated.Results the discharged cases of neurology department included 34 groups of DRGs diagnosis related group and the CMI value was 1.24,which was lower than that of the whole hospital.The time consumption index was 0.84,and the expense consumption index was 0.95,which were higher than the hospital cases.Conclusions There was still a gap between the length of stay and medical expenses of inpatients in neurology department and the level of key specialties.
作者 董爱然 邓应梅 吕方 王玥 石斌 赵琳 Dong Airan;Deng Yingmei;Lv Fang;Wang Yue;Shi Bin;Zhao Lin(Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《中国病案》 2019年第9期45-48,共4页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 DRGS 重点专科评价 神经内科 DRGs Evaluation of key specialties Neurology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1蔡志明,王琦,王光明,陈春涛,卢祖询.医院绩效评估与绩效管理[J].中国医院,2005,9(2):42-46. 被引量:81
  • 2WY Jian,YM Huang,M Hu,et al.Performance evaluation of inpatient service in Beijing:a horizontal comparison with risk adjustment based on Diagnosis Related Groups[EB/OL].(2009-04-30)[2010-04-06].http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/72.
  • 3Glance LG;,Osler TM,Dick A.Bating the quality of intensive care units:is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system[J].Critical Care Medicine,2002,30:1976-82.
  • 4Barros PP.Random output and hospital performance[J].Health Care Management Science,2003 (11):219-228.
  • 5Needham MB,Hailing JF.Factors which predict patient satisfaction of nutrition care in a hospital settiag[J].Journal of the American Dietetic Association,1998,98(9):107.
  • 6马晓伟在国家临床重点专科建设工作座谈会上的讲话http://portal.stun.edu.cn/xwzx/xinwensudi/2012-07-13/46774.html.2012:7-13.
  • 7学校召开“国家临床重点专科项目”建设情况汇报会http://www. moh. gov. cn/publicfiles/business/ht'mlfiles/maxw/pldjh/ 201104/51275. htm,2011:4 - 13.
  • 8西奥多.H.波伊斯特.公共部门与非营利性组织绩效考评:方法与应用[M].中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 9Coldfield N. The evolution of diagnosis-related groups(DRGs) :from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory,to its implementation for payment and now for its currentutilization for quality within and outside the hospital [ J ]. QManage Health Care, 2010,19(1) : 3-16.
  • 10Reid B.Sutch S. Comparing diagnosis-related group systems toidentify design improvements[J]. Health Policy, 2008,87(1):82-91.

共引文献97

同被引文献29

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部