2Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, et al. Supplemental perioperatiw oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound inf tion. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(3): 161-167.
3Denault A, Fr6chette D, Skrobik Y. Best evidence in anesthetic practice. Prevention: supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of surgical-wound infection. Can J Anaesth, 2001, 48(9 ) : 844-846.
4Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcla de la AsunciSn J, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2005, 294( 16): 2035 -2042.
5Gardella C, Goltra LB, Laschansky E, etal. High-t:oneentration supplemental ,perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of postcesarean surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112( 3 ) : 545-552.
6Maragakis LL, Cosgrove SE, Martinez EA, et al. lntraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen is a modifiable risk taetor for surgical Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(3).
7P Tor KO, Fahey TJ 3rd, l,ien CA, et al. Surgical site inl ction and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2004, 291(1 ): 79 -87.
8Bustamante J, Tamayo E, Alvarez FJ, et al. Intraoperatiw PaO: is not related to the development of surgi :al site infections after major cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg, 20tl, 6: 4.
9Togioka B, Galvagno S, Sumida S, st al. Tile role of pcrioperative high inspired oxygen therapy in reducing surgical sits int} (:lion: a meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg, 2012, 114 ( 2 ) : 334-342.
