消化道造影与胃镜检查诊断胃粘膜脱垂的对比

Comparison of Gastrointestinal Radiography and Gastroscopy Diagnosis of Gastric Mucosal Prolapse

目的:对消化道造影和胃镜检查诊断胃粘膜脱垂的优缺点进行对比,以提高胃粘膜脱垂诊断率。方法选取4w消化道造影人员和1w胃镜检查人员当次检查及历史记录图像回顾,得出阳性率,进行对比总结。结果消化道造影阳性率16.9%,明显低于胃镜检查44.8%的阳性率。结论胃粘膜脱垂影响人们的生活,诊断胃粘膜脱垂以消化道检查为首选,但射线量大,检出率低,胃镜检查敏感,检出率高,但无统一标准。

Objective The advantages and disadvantages of gastrointestinal radiography and gastroscopy diagnosis of prolapse of gastric mucosa were compared,in order to improve the diagnosis rate of gastric mucosa prolapsed.Methods Selected 4 gastrointestinal radiography and gastroscopy in 1 weeks when the inspection personnel and record image review,obtained the positive rate,analyzed.Results The positive rate of digestive tract radiography 16.9%,significantly lower than the positive rate of gastroscopy in 44.8%.Conclusion Prolapse of gastric mucosa af ect people's lives,the diagnosis of prolapse of gastric mucosa in gastrointestinal examination is the first choice,but the ray volume,low detection rate of gastroscopy,sensitive,high detection rate,but no unified standard.