期刊文献+

3D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的前期临床应用

Preliminary Clinical Application of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Prostate Cancer 3D
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨3D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的前期手术经验及优势。方法回顾性分析我科6例行3D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者的手术时间、术中出血量、短期手术并发症,并总结早期手术经验及其与传统2D腹腔镜的区别与优势。结果6例患者中2例行淋巴结清扫患者手术时间分别为270min、250min,平均手术时间260min;其余4例未行淋巴结清扫患者平均手术时间为188min(160~240min)。平均术中出血量为483ml(200~800ml)。术后1例患者出现膀胱颈尿道吻合口漏,其余患者无短期并发症发生。结论通过本次3D腹腔镜的前期临床应用,我们认为3D腹腔镜相比传统2D腹腔镜,具有高清晰3D立体视野、学习曲线短、维护方便、使用成本可接受、价格适中的特点。 Objective To present the experience of initial radical prostatectomy by 3D laparoscope and discuss the advantage of 3D laparoscope compare with the 2D laparoscope.Methods We review the operation duration/blood loss/short-term complications of 6 patients diagnosed with localized prostate carcinoma undergoing 3D laparoscopy radical prostatectomy,and summarize the experience of operation.Results The mean operation duration is 260min for two patients who received lymph node dissection(250/270min)and the mean operation duration is 188min for the other 4 patients(range from 160min to 240min).The mean blood loss during operation is 483ml(range from 200~800ml).1 patient had the leakage of the bladder neck-urethral anastomosis after operation,and the other patients did not have short-term complications.Conclusion Compare with 2D laparoscopy radical prostatectomy,3D laparoscopy radical prostatectomy has the high definition three-dimensional vision and make the learning curve shorter.Also the 3D laparoscope system is easy to maintain,and its price is acceptable.
作者 杨磊 吴小候 YANG Lei;WU Xiao-hou(Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical University of Chongqing,Chongqing 400016,China)
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第29期25-25,共1页 Medical Information
关键词 腹腔镜 前列腺癌 Laparoscope Prostate carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Cathelineau X,Arroyo C,Rozet F,et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the new gold standard? Curr Urol Rep,2004,5:108-114.
  • 2Ahlering TE,Woo D,Eichel L,et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy:a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology,2004,63: 819-822.
  • 3Moinzadeh A,Abouassaly R,Gill IS,et al. Continuous needle vented Foley catheter suction for urinary leak after radical prostatectomy. JUrol, 2004,171: 2366-2367.
  • 4Cathelineau X, Cahill D,Widmer H,et al. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol,2004,171:714-716.
  • 5Touijer AK,Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol,2004,22:133-138.
  • 6Johnson CW,McKiernan JM,Anastasiadis AG,et al. Prognostic indicators for long term outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer involving the seminal vesicles. Urol Oncol,2004,22:107-111.
  • 7Rassweiler J,Schulze M,Teber D,et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy :functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol,2004,14:75-82.
  • 8Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG, et al. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic redical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatetomy. Urol Oncol,2004,22:102-106.
  • 9Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Strup SE, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:a multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. Urology ,2004,63:99-102.
  • 10Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G,et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol,2003 ,44 :401-406.

共引文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部