期刊文献+

鼻塞式无创同步间歇指令通气治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的临床探讨

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨鼻塞式无创同步间歇指令通气(nSIMV)治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的疗效。方法收集2012年1月~2013年12月,我院收治的呼吸衰竭新生儿64例,随机分为观察组与对照组,各32例,观察组行nSIMV,对照组行鼻塞式持续气道正压通气(nCPAP),比较两组的疗效。结果3h、6h时观察组的PaCO2、PaO2及FiO2水平较对照组显著改善(P<0.05);观察组的通气时间和住院时间较对照组显著降低(P<0.05);观察组机械通气失败、颅内出血、VAP及呼吸暂停发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 nSIMV用于治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭疗效显著,值得推广应用。
作者 李明
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第13期531-531,共1页 Medical Information
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献49

  • 1Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, et ah Gas exchange and lung inflammation using nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in piglets with saline lavage-induced lung injury: an observational study. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1) : 183-187.
  • 2Davis PG, Lemyre B, de Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure ( NCPAP ) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001, (3): CD003212.
  • 3Ho JJ, Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart D J, et al. Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, (2): CD002271.
  • 4Lemyre B, Davis PG, de Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, ( 1 ) : CD002272.
  • 5Higgins JPT, Green S. Coehrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2.
  • 6Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, et al. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol, 1999, 19(6 Pt 1) :413-418.
  • 7Barrington K J, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 2001, 107 (4) :638-641.
  • 8Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extuhation. Pediatrics, 2001,108 ( 1 ) : 13-17.
  • 9Khorana M, Paradeevisut H, Sangtawesin V, et al. A randomized trial of non-synchronized nasopharyngeal intermittent mandatory ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams. J Med Assoc Thai, 2008, 91 (S3) : 136-142.
  • 10Moretti C, Giannini L, Fassi C, et al. Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birthweight infants: unmasked randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Int, 2008, 50(1 ) :85-91.

共引文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部