期刊文献+

Emergent and delayed hybrid external fixation management of tibial pilon fractures: A multicentric retrospective analysis of 80 patients 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To report our experience with the hybrid external fixator in emergency.Methods:We assessed 80 cases of pilon fracture treated with the external fixator during the period of January 2009 and December 2016:55 men (69%) and 30 women (33%) with a mean age of 40 years (range between 16 and 70 ). About 45 occurred as isolated trauma, 35 instead were politrauma. Each patient underwent standard radiographic examination and a CT examination. There were 28 open fractures (35%), (Gustilo type 1, 2 and 3) while closed fractures showed soft tissue involvement of various grade (2-3 Tscherne classification). In all cases, the external fixation, sometimes associated with other reduction and synthesis techniques, was used. The timing of surgery was dictated by the condition of the soft tissues. For clinical evaluation, the Mazur score with mean follow-ups at 12 months was utilized.Results:The final range of ankle motion was 15 dorsal and 10 plantar flexion. In about 80 cases there was an average Mazur score of83. The mean score was 90;in open fractures 85 to 72. Radiographic healing of fractures in 60 patients occurred in 120 days (mean 105 days), at the time when the external fixator was removed.Conclusion:Pilon fractures are complex and often present complications;the definitive treatment, in emergency or delayed, with hybrid external fixator permits a stable synthesis with minimal soft tissue damage. Weight bearing maybe allowed early and functional recovery is generally good.
出处 《Journal of Acute Disease》 2017年第4期169-174,共6页 急性病杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 1De Vries JS, Wijgman AJ, Sierevelt IN, et al. Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:211-217.
  • 2Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Decisions and staging leading to definitive open man- agement of pilon fractures: where have we come from and where are we now? J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:488-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.ObO13 e31822fbdbe.
  • 3Poyanli O, Esenkaya 1, Ozkut AT, et al. Minimally invasive reduction technique in split depression type tibial pilon fractures. J Foot Ankle Su. 2012;51: 254-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.034.
  • 4Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, et al. Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15: 153-160.
  • 5Xu YQ, Li Q, Shen TG, et al. An efficacy analysis of surgical timing and pro- cedures for high-energy complex tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Surg. 2013;5: 188-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12057.
  • 6Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Bess RS, et al. Outcomes after treatment of high- energy tibial plafood fractures.J Bonet urgAm. 2003;85:1893-1900.
  • 7Harris AM, Patterson BM, Sontich JK, et al. Results and outcomes after operative treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27: 256-265.
  • 8Downs SH, Black H. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998:52:377-384.
  • 9Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta- analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
  • 10Bonar S, Marsh JL, Andre M. Unilateral external fixation vs. open reduction and internal fixation of severe tibial plafond fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:169.

共引文献8

同被引文献10

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部