期刊文献+

Changes in process and outcome for ST elevation myocardial infarction in central China from 2011 to 2018

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Limited data are available on the changes in the quality of care for ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)during China’s health system reform from 2009 to 2020.This study aimed to assess the changes in care processes and outcome for STEMI patients in Henan province of central China between 2011 and 2018.Methods:We compared the data from the Henan STEMI survey conducted in 2011-2012(n=1548,a cross-sectional study)and the Henan STEMI registry in 2016-2018(n=4748,a multicenter,prospective observational study).Changes in care processes and in-hospital mortality were determined.Process of care measures included reperfusion therapies,aspirin,P2Y12 antagonists,β-blockers,angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers,and statins.Therapy use was analyzed among patients who were considered ideal candidates for treatment.Results:STEMI patients in 2016-2018 were younger(median age:63.1 vs.63.8 years)with a lower proportion of women(24.4%[1156/4748]vs.28.2%[437/1548])than in 2011-2012.The composite use rate for guideline-recommended treatments increased significantly from 2011 to 2018(60.9%[5424/8901]vs.82.7%[22,439/27,129],P<0.001).The proportion of patients treated by reperfusion within 12 h increased from 44.1%(546/1237)to 78.4%(2698/3440)(P<0.001)with a prolonged median onset-to-first medical contact time(from 144 min to 210 min,P<0.001).The use of antiplatelet agents,statins,andβ-blockers increased significantly.The risk of in-hospital mortality significantly decreased over time(6.1%[95/1548]vs.4.2%[198/4748],odds ratio[OR]:0.67,95%confidence interval[CI]:0.50-0.88,P=0.005)after adjustment.Conclusions:Gradual implementation of the guideline-recommended treatments in STEMI patients from 2011 to 2018 has been associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.However,gaps persist between clinical practice and guideline recommendation.Public awareness,reperfusion strategies,and construction of chest pain centers need to be further underscored in central China.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2023年第18期2203-2209,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by the grant from Project of Scientific and Technological Support Plan of Health and Family Planning Commission of Henan Province in 2016[No.201602210].
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1陈晓辉,江慧琳,林飒仪,田朝伟,李敏,杜雪梅,刘炳烦,李炳流,李燕屏.急诊室内使用瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效评价[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(8):855-858. 被引量:19
  • 2杨红梅,卞秋武,张继红,刘晓媛,王雪青,孟晓京,王庆胜,孙丽敏.瑞替普酶和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的临床研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(11):733-735. 被引量:10
  • 3Doi M, Nosaka K, Miyoshi T, et al. Early eicosapentaenoic acid treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention reduces acute inflammatory responses and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction : a randomized, controlled study [ J ]. Int J Cardiol, 2014,176 ( 3 ) : 577-582. DOI : 10. 1016/j. ijcard. 2014.08. 055.
  • 4Aghaabdollahian S, Rabbani M, Ghaedi K, et al. Molecular cloning of Reteplase and its expression in E. coli using tac promoter[ J. Adv Biomed Res, 2014,3:190. DOI: 10. 4103/ 2277-9175. 140622.
  • 5An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators [J]. N Engl J Med, 1993,329(10) :673-682. DOI:10.1056/ NEJMI99309023291001.
  • 6Reed SD, McMurray JJ, Velazquez E J, et al. Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the valsartan in acute myocardial infarction (VALIANT) trial [ J ]. Am Heart J, 2006, 152 (3):500-508. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ahj. 2006.02. 032.
  • 7Akhtar N, Khan Y J, Ahmed W recurrent mechanical heartvalve Assoc, 2011,61 (2) : 189-192.
  • 8Thrombolysis with reteplase for thrombosis [ J]. J Pak Med Weaver WD. Results of the RAPID 1 and RAPID 2 thrombolytic trials in acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 1996,17 Suppl E : 14-20.
  • 9Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT):trial to investigate equivalence. International joint efficacy comparison of thrombolytics [ J ]. Lancet, 1995, 346 (8971) :329-336.
  • 10瑞替普酶在STEMI溶栓治疗的中国专家共识[J].中国心血管病研究,2011,9(10):721-727. 被引量:23

共引文献250

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部