摘要
目的:伴有心律失常症状的老年冠心病患者于其护理工作中开展综合护理,对促进患者心功能指标改善及提升患者满意度的价值探究。方法:此次研究共计收录病例样本 60 例,均收录于 2019 年 2 月—2020 年 1 月期间在我院接受治疗的冠心病心律失常老年患者,样本入院后均接受相应的常规治疗方案,并行规范性分组,通过开展不同的临床护理方案实施此次对比分析,分别为对照组(常规护理)、观察组(综合护理)。统计不同组别样本在心功能指标、满意度间的差异性。结果:就治疗措施开展前后针对组间各项心功能指标参数进行比较,结果显示开展前差异性并不明显,开展后两组虽均有所改善,但各项参数值均以观察组更具优势,P<0.05。就两组护理质量进行评价,观察组从服务态度、操作熟练度和规范性、宣教工作的全面性以及家属满意度方面的评分均高于对照组,P<0.05。结论:伴有心律失常症状的老年冠心病患者于其护理工作中开展综合护理,对促进患者心功能指标改善及提升患者满意度的价值显著。Abstract:Objective: To carry out comprehensive nursing for elderly patients with coronary heart disease accompanied by arrhythmia symptoms in their nursing work, and explore the value of promoting the improvement of patients' cardiac function indicators and improving patients' satisfaction. Methods: A total of 60 case samples were included in this study, all of which were elderly patients with coronary heart disease and arrhythmia treated in our hospital from February 2019 to January 2020. After admission, the samples were all treated with the corresponding conventional treatment plan, and standardized grouping was conducted. They were control group (routine nursing) and observation group (comprehensive nursing). The differences of heart function index and satisfaction among different groups were analyzed. Results: Before and after the implementation of the treatment measures, the comparison of the parameters of heart function between groups showed that the difference was not obvious before the implementation of the two groups, although the two groups were improved after the implementation, but the value of the parameters of the observation group was more advantageous (P<0.05). The nursing quality of the two groups was evaluated. The scores of service attitude, operation proficiency and standardization, comprehensive education work and family satisfaction of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The comprehensive nursing of elderly patients with coronary
