期刊文献+

分类和回归树预测重型颅脑损伤的预后分析 被引量:3

Classification and regression tree(CART)for prediction of outcome after severe head injury.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立一个关于重型颅脑损伤预后的简单、便于使用、变量可以在日常工作中快速获得的预测准确率高的预测模型。方法采用分类和回归树(CART)分析方法,选择8个预后因子,对331例重型颅脑损伤患者的预后进行分析。预后指标由外伤后6月Glasgow结果评分(GOS)评价。结果Glasgow昏迷评分(GCS)是最好的预测因子,血糖、头颅CT表现、年龄是强有力的预测因子。入院次日晨白细胞计数也对预后产生有意义的影响。CART中的所有变量都与预后相关,预测准确率达87.9%。结论CART预测模型能较好地预测重型颅脑损伤病人的预后,是一种简单有效、准确率高的预测方法。 Objective To develop a simple and easy predictive model with a high predictive accuracy,which involves variables that can be rapidly and easily achieved in daily routine practice for outcome after severe head injury. Methods C classification and regression tree (CART) technique were employed in the analysis of data from 331 patients with severe brain injury. A total of 8 prognostic indicators were selected, while Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) at 6 months after head injury as prognostic criterion. Results Our results indicated that Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) was the best predictor of outcome. Glucose level,computed tomographic findings and age were proven to be strong predictors, leukocytosis on the 2nd day was found to correlate significantly with prognosis, too. The overall predictive accuracy of CART model for these data was 87.9%. All variables included in this tree have been shown to be related to outcome. Conclusion The CART were proven useful in developing a simple and effective predictive model for outcome after severe head injury,with the variables simply and easily to get.
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2007年第5期387-389,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
关键词 重型颅脑损伤 分类和回归树 预后 Severe head injury Classification and regression tree Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Uear T,Baykal A,Akyuz M,et al.Comparison of serum and cerebrospinal fluid prote in S-100b levels after severe head injury and their prognostic importance[J].J Trauma,2004,57:95-98.
  • 2[2]Amantini A,Gdppo A,Foaai S,et al.Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute eonla from severe traumatic brain injury:evidence for validity of short latency SEPs[J].Clin Neurophysiol,2005,116:229-235.
  • 3[3]Ono J,Yamaura A,Kubota M et al.Outcome prediction in severe head injury:analyses of clinical prognostic factors[J].J Clin Neurosci,2001,8:120-123.
  • 4[4]Gan BK,Lim JH,Ng IH.Outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury amongst the elderly in Singapore[J].Ann Acad Med Singapore,2004,33:63-67.
  • 5[5]Pillai SV,Kolluri VR,Praharaj SS.Outcome prediction model for severe diffuse brain injuries:development and evaluation[J].Neurol India,2003,51:345-349.

同被引文献15

  • 1王建莉,金国良,俞学斌,李锦泉,王晓明,裘天仑.分类和回归树分析预测闭合性重型颅脑损伤预后的研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2007,23(3):167-170. 被引量:14
  • 2Mattioli C,Beretta L,Gerevini S,et al. Traumatic subaraehnoid hemorrhage on the computerized tomography scan obtained at admission:a multicenter assessment of the accuracy of diagnosis and the potential impact on patient outcome [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003,98 : 37-42.
  • 3Marmarou A,Signoretti S,Fatouros PP,et al ,Predominance of cellular edema in traumatic brain swelling in patients with severe head injuries [J]. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2006,104 : 720-730.
  • 4BorSengShu E, Figueiredo EG, Amorim RL, et al. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intraeranial pres- sure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 117(3): 589-596.
  • 5Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, et al. Prediction of out- come in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic char-acteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic clas- sification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(6): 1173-1182.
  • 6Andriessen TM, Horn J, Franschman G, et al. Epidemiology, severity classification, and outcome of moderate and severe trau- matic brain injury: a prospective multicenter study [J]. J Neuro- trauma, 2011, 28(10): 2019-2031.
  • 7Ucar T, Akyuz M, Kazan S, et al. Role of decompressive Surgery in the management of severe head injuries: prognostic factors and patient selection[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2005, 22(11): 1311-1318.
  • 8Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B, Steyerberg EW, et al. Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(5): 543-554.
  • 9Bobinski L, Oliveerona M, Koskinen LO. Dynamics of brain tissue changes induced by traumatic brain injury assessed with the Marshall, Morris-Marshall, and the Rotterdam classifications and its impact on outcome in a prostacyclin placebo-controlled study [J]. Acta Neurochir, 2012, 154(6): 1069-1079.
  • 10Flint AC, Manley GT, Gean AD, et al.Post-Operative Expansion of Hemorrhagic Contusions after Unilateral Decompressive Hemi- craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2008, 25(5): 503-512.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部