采煤业生态足迹及地区间的差异被引量：9

Ecological footprints in coal mining industry and inter-area differences

下载PDF

导出

摘要在计算江苏徐州市和山西长治市生态足迹的基础上,提出了计算采煤业生态足迹的方法.并用3种不同的方法比较了徐州和长治两地采煤业生态足迹的地区差异:徐州市开采万吨原煤的生态足迹占矿区生态承载力的比例为26%,长治市为51%;采煤业万元产值的生态足迹徐州市为0.74 hm2,长治市为0.78 hm2;按产值比重算,万吨原煤产量的生态足迹徐州市为52.07hm2,长治市为66.81 hm2.同时还分析了同一地区单位产值的采煤业与其他产业生态足迹的差异,长治市采煤业生态足迹与其他行业生态足迹较为接近,而徐州市采煤业生态足迹则远大于其他行业的生态足迹. Based on ecological footprints model and the calculation of the ecological footprints of Xuzhou city in Jiangsu Province and Changzhi city in Shanxi Province in 2003,proposed the calculation method of ecological footprints of coal mining industry.Furthermore,by there different methods compared the inter-area differences of ecological footprints of coal mining industry: The ecological footprints of 104 tons coal mining accounted for 26% of ecological carrying capacity in Xuzhou city and for 51% in Changzhi c...

作者金丹卞正富

机构地区中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院

出处《煤炭学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期225-229,共5页 Journal of China Coal Society

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(50574095) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划基金资助项目(NCET-04-0487) 中国矿业大学科技基金资助项目(2005B019 D200405)

关键词采煤业生态足迹差异 coal mining industry ecological footprints difference

分类号 F42 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000(10):8-10. 被引量：522
2[2]Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.Ecological footprints of nations[A].Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio + 5 Forum,International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives[C].Toronto,Canada,1997.10 ～ 21.
3[3]Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.National natural accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999 (29):375～390.
4王广成,闫旭骞.矿区生态系统健康评价指标体系研究[J].煤炭学报,2005,30(4):534-538. 被引量：36
5徐君,曾旗,杜文.矿区城市可持续发展的综合评价研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(1):56-60. 被引量：13
6[7]徐州统计局.徐州统计年鉴-2004[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004.
7[8]长治统计局.长治统计年鉴-2004[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004.
8中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2004[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004..
9[11]国家统计局农村社会经济调查总队.中国农村住户调查年鉴-2004[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004.
10[13]国家统计局工业交通统计司.中国工业经济统计年鉴-2004[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2004.

二级参考文献12

1[4]毛志峰. 区域可持续发展的理论与对策[M]. 武汉:湖北科学技术出版社, 2000.
2[5]Marshall J U. Beyond the rank-size rule: A new description model of city size[J]. Urban Geography, 1999, 18(1):36-55.
3[6]Stern D I. The capital theory approach to sustainability: A critical appraisal[J], Journal of Economic Issues, 1997,31:145-173.
4[7]John A A, Pecchenino R A. International and intergenerational environmental externalities[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1997,99:371-387.
5[8]Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Sustainable Development-OECD Policy Approaches for the 21st Century[M]. Paris: OEDC 1997.
6谢季坚刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2001..
7Xu Fuliu, Joergensen S E, Tao Shu, et al. Modeling the effects of ecological engineering on ecosystem health of a shallow eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chao) [J]. Ecological Modeling, 1999, 117 (2/3) : 239 -260.
8Scrimgeour G J, Wicklum D. Aquatic ecosystem health and integrity: problems and potential solutions [ J ]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1996, 15 (2) : 254 -261.
9Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J. Assessing ecosystem heath [J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1998, 13:397- 402.
10Mageau M T, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R E. Quantifying the trends expected in developing ecosystems[J]. Ecological Modeling, 1998, 112 (1): 1-22.