摘要
一百多年来 ,西方经济学者对马克思劳动价值论的争论 ,沿袭了《资本论》一、三卷是否“矛盾”———“转形问题”能否求解———劳动价值论是否“必要”这种由表及里的推进思路 ,论争的实质在于抛弃、还是坚持马克思的劳动价值论。在进行社会主义市场经济改革和发展的今天 ,在对马克思劳动价值论的百年论争中重新审视中外经济理论发展的历史和现实 ,才能更加清楚地认识马克思劳动价值论在新的时代条件下具有的新的意义 ,从而坚定地捍卫马克思的劳动价值理论。
The controversies on Marxs labor theory of value by western scholars have being continued to use the train of thought from easy to difficult for more than 100 years. That is, whether volume one contradicts volume three——whether the transformation problem can be resolved——whether the labor theory of value is indispensable. And the essence of the controversies is that whether we should insist on Marxs labor theory of value or not. Today, in the reforming of socialist construction, if we look closely at the history and reality of the developments of Chinese and western economic theories during 100 yearscontroversies, we can recognize the new significance of Marx's labor theory of value in the new times more clearly,and defend it more firmly.
出处
《财经科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期103-107,共5页
Finance & Economics
关键词
西方学者
马克思
劳动价值论
争论
Western schoolar
Marx
Labor theory of value
Controversy