摘要
矫正正义与分配正义并不是分别代表立法正义与司法正义,矫正正义也不是以分配正义为前提,二者是法律配置资源的两种方式,矫正正义意味着损害的解决与行为“不公”相联系。过错责任原则所体现的矫正正义只是一个特定的形态,严格责任的存在基础仍然是矫正正义。应该把矫正正义确立为侵权行为法的价值基础,以树立侵权行为法的独立品格,并使其不断进行制度创新。
The corrective justice and distributive justice,as the article fingers,do not correspond with the legislative justice and judicial justice respectively and,corrective justice does not condition on distributive justice.They are in nature two ways for law distributing resources,and corrective justice implies that resolution of injuries draws upon unfairness of conduct.Corrective justice as reflected by fault liability doctrine,is in essence merely a specific form,while the base of strict liability doctrine is...
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2006年第5期1-7,共7页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
基金
黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划办基金(05B010)
关键词
侵权行为法
矫正正义
过错责任
严格责任
Tort Law
corrective justice
fault liability doctrine
strict liability doctrine