摘要
诺齐克从洛克,即古典自由主义的自然状态和自然权利中推导出人们于国家和政府出现前即享有抽象财产权利,并通过个人劳动获得对某物的具体独占和支配的权利。我们可以对这种自然权利中推导而出的财产权利的道德正当性反思,并对劳动获取原则中可能存在的缺陷和接受洛克的限制性条款所致的财产权利和福利权利的矛盾性共存的困境进行梳理和质疑。在此基础上,John Hasnas所提出的"经验式自然权利"的解释更值推崇。
As the basis of personal property right,Nozick partly relied on Locke s interpretation of the state of nature and natural rights.The Abstract property right is supposed to exist before states and governments and individuals could get right of appropriation and disposition on specific goods through labor.The author rethinks its moral justification,clarify the pitfalls in principle of labor acquisition and oppugn inconsistent coexistence of property right and welfare right.Based on it,prefer the interpretatio...
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2007年第4期8-11,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
财产权利
劳动获取原则
限制性条款
福利权利
Property Right
Principle of Labor Acquisition
the Proviso
Welfare Right