2[1]Mehta S. Statistical symmary of clinical results of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis. In: Vascular access for hemodialysqs. SommerBG, Henry ML(Ed). Chicago: Precept Press, 1991,218
3[2]Kaufmam JL. The decline of the autogenous hemodialysis access site. SeminDial, 1995,8:59
4[3]U.S. Renal Data Systm: X. The oost effectiveness of altenative types of vascular access and the econrric cost of ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis ,1995 , ( Suppl )26 :S140
5[4]Miller PE, Carlton D, Deierhoi MH, et al. Natural histoty of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2000,36:68
6[5]Vogel KM, Martino MA, O'Brien SP, et al. Cornplications of lower extyemity arteriovenous grafts in patients with end - stage renal disease.South Med J,2000,93:593
7[6]Windus DW, Endrisak MD, Delmez JA. Prothetic fistula survival and complications in hemodialysis patients: effects of diabetes and age. Am J Kiddney Dis, 1992,19:448
8[7]Revanur VK, Jardine AG, Hamilton DH, et al. Outcome for arterio-ve nous fistula at the elbow for hemodiaysis. Clin Transplant , 2000, 14:318
9[8]Windus DW. Pemanetn vasscular access: A nephrologist's view. Am J Kidney Dis, 1993,21:457
10[9]Galbraith S, Fan P, Collins D, et al. Hemodialysis fistula thromboses: Aprospective evaluation of anatomic versus nonnatomic causes. J Am SocNephrol( abstract ), 1992,3:365
