期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

探析英语附加疑问句的语用功能 被引量：3

A Pragmatic Analysis of Tag Question in English
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语附加疑问句作为一个具有疑问形式的独立语法单位,它具有语义和语用内涵。从语用内涵角度出发,附加疑问句具有调节,维系和发展人际关系;诱导听话者对所陈述信息加以确认;并且积极参与话语讨论等语用功能。本文通过定量分析三类对话部分同属会话语篇的语料,旨在揭示会话语篇中均不同程度的存在有标记的附加疑问句,以期对外语教学和教材编写有所启示和裨益。 Tag question in English is an independent grammar unit with the interrogative from,which has semantic and pragmatic meaning.From the view of pragmatics,tag question has some functions as follows: adjusting,maintaining,and developing to interpersonal relationship;guiding the hearer to confirm the previous statement;and playing an active part in discourse s discussion.Based upon analysis of three texts,this paper is an attempt to explore there exist a lot of marked tag questions in English in the hope of cont...
作者 林美珍
机构地区 厦门大学外文学院
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2007年第5期135-137,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 附加疑问句 语用功能 会话语篇 tag question pragmatic functions conversation texts
分类号 H314 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]Alexander,L.G.Longman English Grammar[M].London:Longman,1988.
  • 2[2]Berninger,G.&Garvey,C.Tag Constructions:Structure and function in Child Discourse[J].Journal of Child Language,1982(9):151-168.
  • 3[3]Biber,D.Et al.Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English[M].Pearson Education Limited,1999.
  • 4[4]Brown,C.What Discourse Analysis Reveals about Tag Questions[Z].Paper Presented at the Annual TESOL Conference.Detroit:U.S.A,1981.
  • 5[5]Cattell,R.Negative Transportation and Tag Questions[J].Language,1973(3):613 -639.
  • 6[6]Holmes,J.Women,Men and Politeness[M].London:Longman,1995.
  • 7[7]Hudson,R.A.The Meaning of Questions[J].Language,1975(1):1-31.
  • 8[8]Kruisinga,E.A Handbook of Present-Day English[M].Groningen:Noord hoff,1931.
  • 9[9]Lakoif,R.Language and Women's Palace[M].New York:Harper Colophon,1975.
  • 10[10]Palmer,H.E.A Grammar of Spoken English[M].Cambridge:Heifer,1969.

二级参考文献46

  • 1沈家煊.“语法化”研究综观[J].外语教学与研究,1994,26(4):17-24. 被引量：1150
  • 2Beths, Frank. 1999. The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality [J]. Linguistics 37:1069-1110.
  • 3Borjars, Kersti, Thorhallur Eythorsson & Nigel Vincent, 2002. On defining degrammaticalisation [A]. University of Manchester. Online.
  • 4Boyland, Joyce Tang. 1996. Morphosyntactic Change in Progress: A Psycholinguistic Treatment[D]. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
  • 5Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Grammaticalization as a strong source of explanation [A]. Universite du Quebec a Montreal. Online.
  • 6Browman, Catherine P., and Louis M. Goldstein. 1992. Articulatory phonology: an overview [J]. Phonetica 49: 155-180.
  • 7Burridge, K. 1998. From modal auxiliary to lexical verb [A]. In R. Hogg & L. van Bergen (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1995. Vol II: Germanic linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19-33.
  • 8Bybee, Joan. 2002. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization [A]. University of New Mexico. Online.
  • 9Bybee, J. L. and W. Pagliuca. 1987. The evolution of future meaning [A]. In A. G. Ramat, O. Carruba and G. Bemini (eds), Papers from the VIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics[C]. 109-22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 10Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

共引文献144

同被引文献14

引证文献3

齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）
2007年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部