期刊文献+

中国证券市场审计师声誉溢价与审计质量的经验研究 被引量:55

An Empirical Study on Premium of Auditor's Reputation and Audit Quality in Chinese Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 审计师在证券市场上被誉为公共利益的守护神。然而,由于证券市场上的利益相关各方无从直接识别审计报告的质量,因而审计市场便具有了"柠糠市场"的特征。当交易双方处在高度的信息不对称条件下时,声誉作为一种信号传递机制发挥着不可替代的作用。本文使用中国沪、深两市上市公司2000—2002年度年报审计费用数据,应用信号传递理论,研究了共2520个样本的审计师声誉溢价现象。研究发现:中国本地前五(四)大会计师事务所相对于本地其他所,其溢价幅度为7.57%;国际"五(四)大"会计公司在中国内地设立的国际合作所,相对于中国本地除前"五(四)大"以外的事务所而言,其声誉溢价的幅度更高,达到23.12%。研究结果表明,国际合作所、国内大、小会计师事务所之间在审计收费方面存在显著差异,即存在审计师声誉溢价现象。这说明审计师声誉作为审计质量的显示信号,已经得到市场的认同。本文的研究初步验证了中国证监会、财政部与中国注册会计师协会促使本地事务所合并、以便做大做强来提升本地会计师事务所声誉和市场竞争力的政策已经取得成效,中国本地会计师事务所的声誉机制正在形成。 Auditor is honored as the watchdog of public benefits in stock market.But how to evaluate the quality of service they provided is always the public concern.Auditor s report is a public product available to various shareholders in the stock market,but investors normally can not look through its quality from the report itself,Somewhat like the"lemons market".When asymmetric information exists in the transaction,Buyers always take the pro- vider s reputation as a Signal of the quality.For stock market,present ...
出处 《中国会计评论》 2007年第3期401-414,共14页 China Accounting Review
关键词 审计师声誉溢价 审计质量 信号传递 Premium of auditor reputation Audit quality Signaling
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1[1]Arnott,Richard, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1991 :"Moral Hazard and Nonmarket Institutions: Dysfunctional Crowding Out or Peer Monitoring?" American Economic Review 81 (March):179-90.
  • 2[2]Coase, R. H. , 1937: "The Nature of the Firm", Economica, 386-405.
  • 3[4]Coleman, James S. , 1988: "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement) :S95-S120.
  • 4[5]Dasgupta, Partha, 1999: "Economic Development and the Idea of Social Capital", Processed, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • 5[6]Tiebout, C. M. , 1956(1988): "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures", In Martin Ricketts ed., Neoclassical Micraeconomics, Vol. 2, Schools of Thoughts in Economics Series, No. 3. Aldershot, Hants, U. K.: Edward Elgar Publishing; and Brookfield, Vermont: Gower Publishing.
  • 6[3]——1960: "On The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics,Vol. 3: 1-44.
  • 7Allen Craswell, Donald J. Stokes, Janet Laughton,2002, "Auditor independence and fee dependence", Journal of Accounting & Economics,33: 253--275.
  • 8Ananth Seetharaman, Ferdinand A. Gul, Stephen G.Lynn, 2002, "Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross- listed on US markets", Journal of Accountingand Economics, 33: 91--115.
  • 9CSRC.《上市公司发行种类》.http://www.csrc.gov.cn/CSRCSite/tongjiku/199911/default.html,2002年.
  • 10Gretchen Morgenson, 2002,"Watchdog? Lap Dog? WhyHave To Guess?" New York Times, New York, N.Y., Feb.17.

共引文献334

同被引文献765

引证文献55

二级引证文献458

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部