期刊文献+

草地雀麦刈割对坡地水土流失的影响 被引量:7

Meadow Brome(Bromus riparius)Harvesting Effect on Surface Runoff and Soil Loss of Slope Land
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在自然降雨条件下,选择25°坡地种植草地雀麦,建立径流试验小区,并在抽穗期进行刈割处理,研究刈割后草地雀麦生物学特性变化及其对坡地水土流失的影响.结果表明:坡地种植草地雀麦,水土流失防治效果显著,可使25°坡地地表年径流量与土壤侵蚀模数达到6 781.7 m3/km2和36.4 t/km2·a,保水、固土能力为93.0%和99.9%.草地雀麦抽穗期刈割,对其固土能力影响不大,仍可保持93.8%,但对其保水能力影响显著,一定程度上可以增加坡面径流流失,使保水能力降低到53.9%.草地雀麦覆盖对坡地土壤侵蚀影响显著,抽穗期刈割草地雀麦,短期内可使坡面覆盖度下降,土壤侵蚀增加,但随着草地雀麦不断再生,覆盖度快速增加,达到76.7%以后,刈割与无刈割坡地的土壤侵蚀量差异不显著.草地雀麦覆盖度与土壤入渗率对坡地地表径流流失均有一定影响,抽穗期刈割,可使草地雀麦覆盖度减小,0~30 cm土层地下生物量与无刈割坡地相比,减少33.4%,土壤入渗率相应降低,地表径流有所增加. The experiment was conducted to study effect of meadow brome harvesting on surface runoff and soil loss of 25° slope land and its biological characteristics naturally under harvest and no harvest treatments on the heading stage.The effect was evident for meadow brome planting on the slope to prevent water and soil loss.And capabilities of water conservation and soil conservation of meadow brome were 93.0% and 99.9%,while yearly amount of surface runoff and soil erosion modulus were 6 781.7 m3/km2 and 36.4 t/km2·a.However,capability of water conservation of meadow brome descended to 53.9%,and then surface runoff loss had a certain increase when it was harvested on the heading stage,while capability of soil conversation had no obvious change with 93.8%.Otherwise,effect of meadow brome cover on soil loss of slope land was evident.The difference of soil loss was significant between harvest and no harvest treatments due to cover rate decrease and soil erosion increase in the month after harvest,but not after cover rate added to 76.7% with meadow brome regenerating.Meanwhile,amount of surface runoff of slope land was relative to cover rate of meadow brome and soil infiltration rate.Surface runoff improved with cover rate and soil infiltration rate after harvest on the heading stage descending due to underground biomass decreasing by 33.4% in the soil of 0~30 cm as compared with that of no harvest.
出处 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期34-37,59,共5页 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家科技攻关计划项目(2004BA617B02) 北京市科技计划项目(D0705045040291) 北京市科技新星计划(B类)项目(2005B02)
关键词 草地雀麦 刈割 水土流失 meadow brome harvest water and soil loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1黄满湘,章申,张国梁,张秀梅.北京地区农田氮素养分随地表径流流失机理[J].地理学报,2003,58(1):147-154. 被引量:148
  • 2[2]Carroll C,Merton L,Burger P.Impact of vegetation cover and slope on runoff,erosion,and water quality for field plots on a range of soil and spoil materials on central Queenlands coal mines[J].Aust.J.Soil Res.,2000,38:313-327.
  • 3李鹏,李占斌,张兴昌.草灌植被拦蓄径流和泥沙有效性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):32-34. 被引量:11
  • 4[4]Bradford J M,Huang C H.Interrill soil erosion as affected by tillage and residue cover[J].Soil & Tillage Research,1994,31:353-361.
  • 5[5]Cerda A.Parent material and vegetation affect soil erosion in eastern Spain[J].Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J.,1999,63:362-368.
  • 6[6]Kohl R A,Schumacher T E.Infiltration with porous and no porous simulated residue[J].Journal of Soil & Water Conservation,1999,54 (3):574-576.
  • 7王凭青,段传人,王伯初,刘万钱,朱蠡庆.杂交狼尾草水土保持能力的实验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):114-116. 被引量:47
  • 8赵明坤,陈瑞祥.苇状羊茅和鸭茅的水土保持效果[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):92-94. 被引量:16
  • 9[9]Mannering J V,Meyer L D.The effects of various rates of surface mulch on infiltration and erosion[J].Soil Sci.Soc.Am.Proc.,1963,27:84-86.
  • 10[10]Brakensiek D L,Rawls W J.Soil containing rock fragments:effects on infiltration[J].Catena,1994,23:99-110.

二级参考文献78

共引文献393

同被引文献86

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部