期刊文献+

美国反托拉斯法域外管辖权研究 被引量:4

A Study of Extraterritoriality Jurisdiction of American Anti-trust Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 最先提出并反复论证反垄断法域外管辖权的是美国。美国反托拉斯法判例中所确立的"效果原则"将国内反垄断立法的管辖权延伸至国外,并为包括中国在内的许多国家所效法。同时,美国也有相应的"合理管辖"原则对反托拉斯法域外管辖权的过度行使加以限制。但是总的来说,扩张行使反托拉斯管辖权的倾向近年来更为明显。 The United States was the first country to raise and justify extraterritoriality jurisdiction of anti-trust laws.The 'principle of consequence' established in American anti-trust case rulings extends the jurisdiction of anti-trust laws to areas outside of the country,and this practice is followed by China and many other countries.Meanwhile,the United States exercises the principle of 'rational jurisdiction' to restrict the overextension of the use of extraterritoriality jurisdiction of anti-trust laws.However,the expansion of the use has become a growing trend in recent years.
作者 王中美
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期56-66,共11页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[2]American Banana Company v.United Fruit Company,213 U.S.347,356,29 S Ct.511,512(1909).
  • 2[1]United States of America v.Aluminum Company of American et.Al,148 F.2d 416,443 (2d Cir.1945).
  • 3[1]Laker Airways,Ltd.v.Sabena,Belgian World Airlines,235 U.S.App.D.C.207.731 F.2d 909 (DC Cir.1984).
  • 4[2]United States v.Imperial Chemical Industries,Ltd,100 F.Supp.504 (S.D.N.Y.1951).
  • 5[3]Todhunter-Mitchell & Co.v.AnheuserBusch.Inc,383 F.Supp.586 (ED pa.1974).
  • 6[5]Timberlane Lumber Co.v.Bank of America,549 F.2d 597(9th cir.1976).
  • 7[1]Joseph P.Griffin,"Extraterritoriality in U.S.and EU Antitrust Enforcement," ABA Antitrust Law Journal,1999,Vol.67,No.1,p.505.
  • 8[1]Richard W.Beckler and Matthew H.Kirtland,"Extraterritorial Application of U.S.Antitrust Law..What Is a 'Direct,Substantial,and Reasonably Foreseeable Effect' under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act?" Texas International Law Journal,Vol.38 (Winter 2003),pp.15~16.
  • 9[2]Richard W.Beckler and Matthew H.Kirtland,"Extraterritorial Application of U.S.Antitrust Law:,pp.14~15.Also see Restatement of the Law,Third,Foreign Relations Law of the United States,Reporters Notes 8 to § 415; Antitrust Enforcement Guidelines for International Operations,1995,3.11 ~3.12.
  • 10[1]Hartford Fire Insurance Co.et al.v.California et al,509 U.S.764,113 S Ct.2891(1993).

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部