摘要
根据控审分离原则,对公诉案件是否提起公诉属于检察机关自由裁量的范畴,法院的主要职责是审判。但是,为了制约检察机关不起诉裁量权,保障被害人人权,德国、日本、韩国及我国台湾地区刑事诉讼法又规定了强制起诉制度,对于检察机关已经作出不起诉决定的案件,赋予被害人申请法院强制起诉的权利。对该制度进行比较研究,分析其合理性及限度,对于改革我国不起诉制约机制,加强被害人人权保障具有重要意义。
According to the principle of separation of prosecution and trial,The indictment whether the case is prosecuted belonging to the procuratorial organs discretionary areas,The main duties of the court is trial.But in order to restrain the discretion not to prosecute of the Procuratorial organs and protect the victim human rights,the Code of Criminal Procedure of Germany,Japan,South Korea and China's Taiwan region also establish mandatory prosecution system,for the procuratorial organs have made decisions not to prosecute the case,Victim mandatory for the court to prosecute cases of rights.Studying on this system,Analyze its reasonablity and limitations,On the reform of China not to prosecute and control mechanisms to strengthen protection of victims human rights is of great significance.
出处
《法学论坛》
北大核心
2007年第5期105-111,共7页
Legal Forum
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"刑事被害人人权保障机制研究"(06XFX015)的阶段成果之一
关键词
强制起诉
不起诉裁量权
司法审查
被害人人权保障
mandatory prosecution
discretion not to prosecute
judicial examination
victims human rights protection