期刊文献+

高烈度区框-筒混合结构动力特性与地震反应研究 被引量:3

RESEARCH ON THE DYNAMIC PROPERTY AND EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF FRAME-CORE WALL HYBRID STRUCTURES IN HIGH SEISMIC INTENSITY REGIONS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 简单介绍了高烈度区混合结构采用型钢混凝土框架—钢筋混凝土筒体的优势,针对高层结构对结构侧移敏感性的特点,并结合混合结构工程实用中常用的几种框架形式,采用SAP2000程序对一高烈度区典型型钢混凝土框架-钢筋混凝土筒体模型进行了有限元分析。研究了该结构体系的动力特性,并集中讨论了框架形式改变对其影响。最后,对该模型结构的地震位移及地震作用分布规律进行了讨论。可以为该类工程结构设计提供参考。 It is briefly presented the superiority of adopting steel reinforced concrete frame-reinforced concrete core wall structure in high seismic intensity regions.Aiming at the sensitivity to lateral displacement of high-rise structure and the several frame modes often adopted in hybrid structure,it is conducted finite element analysis to a steel reinforced concrete frame-reinforced concrete core wall model structure by program SAP2000.The dynamic property of structure is studied,and the influence on structure lateral displacement when the outer frame is in different joint form,beam type and column space is emphatically discussed.In the end,the lateral displacement rules and earthquake load distribution rules are discussed.Some conclusions are help for the design of this kind of structure.
出处 《工业建筑》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第z1期208-212,共5页 Industrial Construction
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50578129)
关键词 框架-核心筒结构 混合结构 动力特性 地震反应 frame-core wall structure hybrid structure dynamic property earthquake response
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1龚炳年,郝锐坤,赵宁.钢-混凝土混合结构模型试验研究[J].建筑科学,1994,10(1):10-14. 被引量:31
  • 2Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building[R].Report ATC-40, 1996.
  • 3FEMA273, FEMA274. NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines for the rehabilitation of building[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996.
  • 4krawinklar H. Pushover analysis: Why, How, and When not to use it[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 5Kicher C A. Capacity spectrum Pushover method: Seeing is Believing[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 6Chopro A K, Goel R K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF Systems[R]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No: PEER-1999/02, University of Califormia at Berkeley, 1999.
  • 7Helmut krawinklar, G D P K. Seneviratna. Pros and Cons of a Pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20:452-464.
  • 8Peter Fajfar. Simple Push-over analysis of building structures[A]. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 1996.
  • 9A S Moghadam. Pushover analysis for asymmetric and set-bace multi-story buildings[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.
  • 10Misael Requena. Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.

共引文献135

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部