期刊文献+

批判格莱斯合作原则,探索理解会话含义的新途径 被引量:1

Critically Assimilate the Cooperative Principle of Grice and Seek New Ways to Understand the Conversational Implicature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 :由于会话含义是隐含于字面意义中的说话者的真实意义 ,缺乏直观性 ,这就为语言的理解 ,特别是跨文化交际中会话含义的理解带来了困难。而格莱斯合作原则只是在微观方面分析了会话含义的产生 ,具有自身的局限性 ,只有结合宏观方面 ,把二者统一起来 。 Because the conversational implicature is the speaker’s true meaning, which is implied in the word meaning, and it cannot be caught directly. So it is difficult to understand the language spoken, especially the intercultural conversational implicature. But Grice just analyzed what leads to the conversational implicature from the microcosmic angle and the method has its limitations. In this dissertation, the writer thinks if we combine the microcosmic points with the macrocosmic points, we can fully understand the conversational implicature.
作者 雷永强
出处 《洛阳师范学院学报》 2001年第1期123-126,共4页 Journal of Luoyang Normal University
关键词 合作原则 会话含义 所知 语境 cooperative principle conversational implicature personal knowledge context
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]Grice. P,1975,logic and conversation in P. cole and J. Morgan(eds)P P.436-44
  • 2[2]Leech G,1983,principles of pragmatics.longman.
  • 3[3]Seale J,1979,expression and meaning Cambridge university press.
  • 4盛炎.跨文化交际中的语体学问题[J].语言教学与研究,1994(2):152-160. 被引量:32

共引文献31

同被引文献7

  • 1张春隆.论合作原则之不足[J].外语学刊,1996(4):86-89. 被引量:9
  • 2(英)StephenC.Levinson著,何兆熊导读.语用学[M]. 外语教学与研究出版社, 2001
  • 3Brown,P,S.Levinson.Universals in Language Usage:Politeness Phenomena[].Questions and Politeness:Strategies in Social Interaction.1986
  • 4Searle John R.Indirect Speech Acts[].Syntax and Semantics : Speech Acts.1975
  • 5Leech Geoffrey N.Principles of Pragmatics[]..1983
  • 6Sperber Dan,Deirdre Wilson.Relevance: Communication and Cognition[]..1986
  • 7陈新仁.会话“不合作”现象论析[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,4(2):37-43. 被引量:21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部