期刊文献+

我国上市公司的债务期限结构——基于权衡思想的实证研究 被引量:1

The Structure of Listed Companies' Debt Maturity in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 债务期限结构的确定是企业对短期债务的优势和缺陷进行权衡的结果,此提出了债务期限结构的权衡思想,为了考察我国上市公司债务期限结构选择的影响因素,利用这一思想对其进行了详细的实证研究。研究结果表明,权衡思想能够较好地解释我国上市公司债务期限结构的选择行为,同时也表明,尽管我国上市公司的短期债务普遍偏高,但这种选择却是其理性思索的结果。 The deciding of the structure of debt maturity is conducted by an enterprise through weighing over the advantages and disadvantages of short-term debt. This paper proposes the balance of the structure of debt maturity in order to survey the influencing factors affecting the selection of the structure of debt maturity in China's listed companies and to conduct detailed empirical study of this issue. The research results show that balance idea can explain China's listed companies behavior in selecting debt maturity structure. Also it tells us that China's listed companies have a high proportion of short-term debt, which, however, is the result of rational decision.
作者 袁卫秋
出处 《河北经贸大学学报》 2005年第5期82-88,共7页 Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
关键词 债务期限结构 权衡思想 财务灵活性 财务实力 debt maturity structure balance idea financial flexibility financial power
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Barclay,M.J.and mith,C.W.(1995),The maturity structure of corporate debt,Journal of Finance 50,609-631.
  • 2[2]Guedes,J.& Opler,T.,1996, "The determinants of thematurity of corporate debt issues" ,Journal of Finance,vol. 51,no.1,pp. 1809-1833.
  • 3[3]Myers,S.C. (1977),Determinants of corporate borrowing, Journal of Financial Econom DCs 5,147-175.
  • 4[4]Smith,Clifford W.,Jr. (1986),Investment banking and thecapital acquisition process,Journal of Financial EconomDCs 26,3-28.
  • 5[5]Ozkan,A.,2000, "An empirical analysis of corporate debt maturity structure" ,European Financial Management,vol.6, nol.2,pp. 197-212.
  • 6袁卫秋.债务期限结构理论综述[J].会计研究,2004(10):9-13. 被引量:52

二级参考文献15

  • 1Barclay M J and Smith C W. 1995. The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt. Journal of Finance, 50:609-631.
  • 2Brick I E and Ravid S A. 1985. On the Relevance of Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Finance, 40:1423 -1437.
  • 3Brick I E and Ravid S A. 1991. Interest Rate Uncertainty and the Optimal Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26:63 - 81.
  • 4Diamond D W. 1991. Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:709-737.
  • 5Emery G W. 2001. Cyclical Demand and the Choice of Debt Maturity. Journal of Business, 74:557-590.
  • 6Flannery M J. 1986. Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice. Journal of Finance, 41: 19 -37.
  • 7Jalilvand A and Harris R S. 1984. Corporate Behaviour in Adjusting to Capital Structure and Dividend Targets: An Econometric Study. Journal of Finance, 39:127 - 145.
  • 8Jensen Michael C. 1986. Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76:323 - 339.
  • 9Kale J R and Noe T H. 1990. Risky Debt Maturity Choice in a Sequential Equilibrium. Journal of Financial Research,13:155 - 165.
  • 10Kane A Marcus A J and McDonald R L. 1985. Debt Policy and the Rate of Return Premium to Leverage. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20:479 ~499.

共引文献51

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部