3[10]Sawicki J T,Padovan J.The dynamics of rotor with rubbing[J].International Jorunal of Rotating Machinery.1999,5(4):295-304.
4Schlienger J, Pfau A, Kalfas A L et al. Effects of labyrinth seal variation on multistage axial turbine flow[C]. GT2003-38270,Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003, Power for Land, Sea, and Air, June 16-19, 2003Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
5Schramm V, Willenborg K, Kim S et al. Influence of a honeycomb-facing on the flow through a stepped labyrinth seal[J]. ASME J. Eng. GasTurbine Power, 2000, 124: 140-146.
6FLUENT User's Guide[S]. Version 6.0, Fluent Inc., Centerra Resource Park, Lebanon, NH, 2001.
7CHILDS D, ELROD D, HALE K. Annular honeycomb seals: test results for leakage and rotordynamic coefficients; comparisons to labyrinth and smooth configurations[J].Journal of Tribology, 1989, 111:293-300.
8KLEYHANS G. A comparison of experimental results and theoretical predictions for the rotordynamic and leakage characteristics of short (L/D=1/6) honeycomb and smooth annular pressure seal[R]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 1991.
9HA T,CHILDS D W. Annular honeycomb-stator turbulent gas seal analysis using new friction-factor model based on flat plate tests[J]. ASME Journal of Tribology,1994,116: 352-360.
10HA T W, CHILDS D W. Friction-factor data for flat plate tests of smooth and honeycomb surfaces (Including Extended Test Data)[R]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 1991.
