期刊文献+

混合法系发展的前沿——兼论中国法学家的理论贡献 被引量:17

The Forefront of Development of Mixed Family——on Chinese Jurists' Theoretical Contributions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 混合法系理论是法系研究的派生物,两者的关系十分密切。混合法系的概念有广义和狭义之分,混合法律体系、混合法域和混合法系三个概念之间存在着递进关系。三次混合法国际研讨会的召开,折射出未来比较法学研究的发展趋势。混合法系的发展与语言、历史、文化等因素紧密相联,未来世界将会形成三大新的混合法系:新欧洲法系、新伊斯兰法系和新中华法系。未来中国法的发展要体现出自己的主体性,中国的法学家应该跳出传统两大法系的固有思维,肩负起中华民族复兴的历史责任感和使命感,努力地去发展混合法理论,在理论创新方面做出新贡献。 The theory of mixed family is a derivative of the study of family.The concepts of mixed legal system,mixed jurisdiction,and mixed family have progressive relations.The holding of three worldwide congresses on mixed jurisdiction reflects a new trend of comparative law study.Thus,the writer puts forward a new three main mixed families in the future world: New European Legal Family,New Islamic Legal Family and New Chinese Legal Family.In order to reflect the subjectivity of Chinese law,Chinese jurists have to ...
作者 夏新华
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期24-30,42,共8页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 混合法理论 新欧洲法系 新伊斯兰法系 新中华法系 the theory of mixed family new European legal family new Islamic legal family new Chinese legal family
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[2]Report on the First Worldwide Congress on Mixed Jurisdiction,WSMJ Newsletter Vol.1 Issue 1,see http://www.mixedjurisdiction.org/voll.pdf.
  • 2[1]http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/conferences/wamjj/index.aspx.
  • 3[3]See http://www.droitcivil.uottawa.ca/world-legal-systems/eng-mixte.php.
  • 4[1]See Esin Orucu,Mixed and Mixing Systems,in William Tetley,Nationalism in a Mixed Jurisdiction and the Importance of Language,from www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/nationalism.pdf.
  • 5[2]See William Tetley,Nationalism in a Mixed Jurisdiction and the Importance of Language,from www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/nationalism.
  • 6[3]See Celia Wasserstein Fassberg,Language and Style in a Mixed System.Tulane Law Review Volume,78 December 2003 Nos.1 & 2.
  • 7[2]See F.P.Walton,The Scope and Interpretation of the Civil Code,Wilson & Lafleur Ltee,Montreal (1907),in William Tetley,Mixed Jurisdictions:common law v.civil law (codified and uncodified),60 Louisiana Law Review 677 (2000),679.
  • 8[3]See R.Evans-Jones,Receptions of Law,Mixed Legal Systems and the Myth of the Genius of Scots Law (1998),114 L.Q.R.228,228.William Tetley,Mixed Jurisdictions:common law v.civil law (codified and uncodified),60 Louisiana Law Review 677(2000),679.
  • 9[2]William Tetley,Nationalism in a Mixed Jurisdiction and the Importance of Language,from www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/nationalism.pdf.
  • 10[德]K·茨威格特 H·克茨 潘汉典.比较法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.172.

共引文献16

同被引文献119

引证文献17

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部