摘要
许霆超额取款案引起了社会的广泛关注,法院对该案的判决关系着其个人的命运,学界对该案的探讨更有助于国家的法制建设。实际上,现代社会越来越多地面临着各种人为风险,个人行为所具有的潜在危险在急剧地增大。许霆超额取款的行为本质上是刑法意义上的危害行为,应属刑法所禁止的风险,并且其符合"易占有为不法所有"的行为结构特征,实质上为侵占行为。但由于我国法律的不完善,其行为并不符合《刑法》中侵占罪的犯罪构成,同时也不符合其他犯罪构成要件,所以,根据罪刑法定原则,许霆不构成犯罪,不应追究其刑事责任。为减少甚至杜绝类似的人为风险,立法机关应尽快修改侵占罪或者对侵占罪作出解释,尤其是将侵占遗忘物、遗失物、埋藏物等对象明确规定为侵占脱离占有物。
The case of Xu Ting s excess cash withdrawal attracted the wide attention of the society.The verdict determines the destiny of an individual and the discussions of the academic circle are conducive to the legal construction of China.In reality,the modern society is confronted with various forms of man-made risks and the potential dangers of individual behaviors are on the increase.Xu s excess cash withdrawal is an endangering behavior in a criminal sense and,in nature,an act of embezzlement,so it should be ...
出处
《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》
2008年第3期129-133,共5页
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
关键词
超额取款
许霆案
ATM故障
禁止风险原则
盗窃罪
侵占罪
信用卡诈骗罪
excess cash withdrawal
the case of Xu Ting
faulty ATM
principle of forbidding risk
offense of theft
crime of embezzlement
credit card fraud