摘要
《明代科举中的官年现象》一文在引用文献时出现理解上的偏差,导致对科道官选拔限年的判断有失准确,万历五年科道选拔的上限是45岁,而不是38岁。该文所谓庶吉士选拔"限年之例始于嘉靖末年"的推断也不够准确,相关文献表明,至少在天顺初期就有限年的规定。明代官年现象除了减年之外,还存在增年现象,这与明代选拔科道官时对年龄既有上限也有下限的规定相吻合。庶吉士选拔年轻化倾向与官员致仕无俸禄的现实,是导致明代士人减年入试的直接原因。
There is misunderstanding when the article The phenomenon of Official Age in the Civil Service Examination of the Ming Dynasty quotes documents,as a result,its deduction that the age of the new Ke & Dao officers should be limited under 38 is wrong,and 45 is the right standard.Moreover,its deduction that the Shu Ji Shi should be selected with an age-limitation began at the end of Jiajing is not right either.Some data show it had been introduced since the early time of Tianshun.The phenomenon of official ages...
出处
《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2008年第2期38-41,共4页
Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目<中国历代登科总录>(项目号03BZS008
主持人龚延明教授)阶段性成果之一
关键词
官年
庶吉士
科道
明代科举
official age
Shu Ji Shi
Ke & Dao officers
civil service examination of the Ming Dynasty
