期刊文献+

个体美学与世界历史的张力——叔本华与黑格尔的实践观比较

The Tension between Individual Aesthetics and World History——Comparison between Schopenhauer and Hegel's Practical Views
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对康德哲学的不同批判,叔本华和黑格尔分别走向个体美学与世界历史。叔本华认为个人在充满意志冲突的世界上生活是痛苦的,只有依靠美学和艺术才能使人获得暂时的解脱。黑格尔则认为世界历史是一个具有必然性的合理的进程。个人只有置身于这一进程中才能找到其存在的价值。这两种实践观之间的张力对现代社会产生了深刘的影响,并对我们今天如何应对现代化和全球化的问题有着重要的启示。 By a different criticizing of Kantian philosophy, Schopenhauer turned to individual aesthetics and Hegel turned to world history. Schopenhauer thought it is a suffering for an individual to live in a world full of conflicting of different wills, only aesthetics and art can free him from the suffering provisionally. Hegel thought world history is a rational inevitable progress; an individual must take part in the progress so as to find its own value. The tension between the two practical views has great influence on the modem society and has important enlightening guidance for us to solve the problems of modernization and globalization today.
作者 杨玉昌
机构地区 中山大学哲学系
出处 《学习与探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期38-42,共5页 Study & Exploration
关键词 个体美学 世界历史 实践观 叔本华 黑格尔 individual aesthetics world history practical view Schopenhauer Hegel
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1]SCHOPENHAUER A.Manuscript Remains(Vol.1)[M].Trans.Payne E.New York:Berg Publishers Limited,1988.
  • 2黑格尔.小逻辑[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980,7..
  • 3黑格尔.法哲学原理.北京:商务印书馆[M],1982.
  • 4[6]SAFRANSKI R.Schopenhauer and The Wild Years of Philosophy[M].Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1990:206.
  • 5[7]SCHOPENHAUER A.The World as Will and Representation[M].New York:Dover Publications,1966:195.
  • 6叔本华.作为意志与表象的世界[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995..
  • 7[9]JANAWAY,CHRISTOPHER.Schopenhauer[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1994.
  • 8[10]SCHOPENHAUER A.Philosophical Writings,Introduction.New York:The Continuum Publishing Company,1998:viii.
  • 9卢卡奇.理性的毁灭[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1997.
  • 10[12]COPLESTON F,S.J.A history of philosophy (vol.7)[M].New York:The Newman Press,1965:31.

共引文献867

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部