摘要
美国民事诉讼作为英美法系民事诉讼的典型代表,与我国的民事诉讼相比无论在结构上还是在制度精神上都截然有别。文章通过对两种程序中一些重要制度的双向比较,力图揭示彼此间的差异以及由差异所反映出的意义所在,以期对我国的民事诉讼改革有所帮助。
As the representative example in Anglo-American civil litigation,American civil procedure is distinctly different from ours in the structure and institution.By comparing some important institutions of two procedures,the author attempts to reveal the differences and the significance reflected by these differences,and wishes to assist the reformation in our civil litigation.
出处
《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》
2006年第4期43-46,共4页
Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
关键词
对抗制
陪审制
诉答
证据开示
反诉
adversary system
jury
pleading
evidential discovery
counterclaim
