期刊文献+

Comparison of diadochokinetic rate between deaf children and normal children 被引量:1

Comparison of diadochokinetic rate between deaf children and normal children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND: Diadochokinetic rate reflects the motion state and synergic level of oral, lingual and speech muscle group, and it is an important index to judge the speech articulation, it is also very significant in the training and evaluation of vocal ability and the correction and treatment of speech. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diadochokinetic rate between deaf children and normal children. DESIGN: A comparative observation. SETTING: College of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty deaf children and 20 normal children of 6-7 years old, half boys and half girls, were selected from Hangzhou Rehabilitation Center for Deaf Children and Hangzhou Fuxing Kindergarten between January and March, 2006. The influences of organic dysarthria on our study had been eliminated, including intellectual and oral diseases, etc. Informed consents were obtained from the guardians of all the enrolled children. METHODS: ① The deaf children all cooperated with the study after proper communication with them. They practiced to pronounce /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ clearly in order, then pronounced them together, that was /pataka/. They should slow down at first in order to pronounce clearly and cohere them together, then speeded up to practice, so that the results could not be affected by the unfamiliar pronunciation. After practice, the deaf children were tested by pronouncing /pataka/ for five time continuously, and they were asked to pronounce clearly and correctly with uniform intensity, loudness, speed, etc. They were tested for three times by the same methods, and the durations of the three times were recorded to obtain the average value, then the velocity was calculated. The tests for the normal children were the same as those mentioned above. ② The differences of the measurement data were compared by the t test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of diadochokinetic rate compared between deaf children and normal children. RESULTS: All the 20 normal children and 20 deaf children were involved in the analysis of results. The diadochokinetic rate was obviously lower in the deaf children than in the normal children [(0.64±0.18), (2.41±0.47) times/s, P < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: The diadochokinetic rate is lower in deaf children than in normal children. It is also suggested that the training of diadochokinetic function should be enhanced in the speech training of deaf children to improve their lingual and oral flexibility and speech articulation. BACKGROUND: Diadochokinetic rate reflects the motion state and synergic level of oral, lingual and speech muscle group, and it is an important index to judge the speech articulation, it is also very significant in the training and evaluation of vocal ability and the correction and treatment of speech. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diadochokinetic rate between deaf children and normal children. DESIGN: A comparative observation. SETTING: College of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty deaf children and 20 normal children of 6-7 years old, half boys and half girls, were selected from Hangzhou Rehabilitation Center for Deaf Children and Hangzhou Fuxing Kindergarten between January and March, 2006. The influences of organic dysarthria on our study had been eliminated, including intellectual and oral diseases, etc. Informed consents were obtained from the guardians of all the enrolled children. METHODS: ① The deaf children all cooperated with the study after proper communication with them. They practiced to pronounce /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ clearly in order, then pronounced them together, that was /pataka/. They should slow down at first in order to pronounce clearly and cohere them together, then speeded up to practice, so that the results could not be affected by the unfamiliar pronunciation. After practice, the deaf children were tested by pronouncing /pataka/ for five time continuously, and they were asked to pronounce clearly and correctly with uniform intensity, loudness, speed, etc. They were tested for three times by the same methods, and the durations of the three times were recorded to obtain the average value, then the velocity was calculated. The tests for the normal children were the same as those mentioned above. ② The differences of the measurement data were compared by the t test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of diadochokinetic rate compared between deaf children and normal children. RESULTS: All the 20 normal children and 20 deaf children were involved in the analysis of results. The diadochokinetic rate was obviously lower in the deaf children than in the normal children [(0.64±0.18), (2.41±0.47) times/s, P < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: The diadochokinetic rate is lower in deaf children than in normal children. It is also suggested that the training of diadochokinetic function should be enhanced in the speech training of deaf children to improve their lingual and oral flexibility and speech articulation.
出处 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第9期853-855,共3页 中国神经再生研究(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1黄昭鸣,万萍.s/z比值在聋儿言语呼吸中的临床价值[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2004,33(4):20-22. 被引量:12
  • 2黄昭鸣,籍静媛.实时反馈技术在言语矫治中的应用[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2004,33(6):35-39. 被引量:11
  • 3黄昭鸣,杜晓新,蔡红霞.平均言语基频常模的制订及其相关研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2005,34(2):26-30. 被引量:20
  • 4[11]J Bruce Tomblin; Linda Spencer; Sarah Flock; Rich Tyler; Bruce Gantz. A comparison of language achievement in children with Cochlear implants and children using hearing aids(1999) . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research v42 no2p497-511
  • 5[12]Blamey, Peter J.; Barry, Johanna G. Jacq, Pascale. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation (2001): Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing R esearch v44 nol p. 73-90
  • 6[4]Childers,D.G;(1991).Assessment of the acoustics of voice prodution NIDCD Monograph.
  • 7[5]Huang,Z,(1998).Voice lab in clinical practice.IALP.
  • 8Huang ZM. Measures of vocal function during change in vocal effort level[J]. Journal of Voice,1994,9:429.
  • 9Huang ZM. Dr. Speech Science for Windows[M]. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group,1995.15~18.
  • 10汪洁.构音障碍综合性评价量表的编制[J].中国康复医学杂志,1998,13(6):242-244. 被引量:23

共引文献29

同被引文献17

  • 1LIXueli,XUBoling.Tone features in whispered Chinese[J].Progress in Natural Science:Materials International,2005,15(3):285-288. 被引量:5
  • 2周涛,傅忠谦,牛永伟,王达,曾燕,汪秉宏,周佩玲.复杂网络上传播动力学研究综述[J].自然科学进展,2005,15(5):513-518. 被引量:71
  • 3刘军. 整体网分析讲义:UCINET 软件实用指南[M]. 上海:格致出版社, 2007.
  • 4Zwicker E, Scharf B. A model of loudness summation [J]. PsychologicalReview, 1965,72 (1): 3-26.
  • 5Moore B C J, Glasberg B R. A revision of Zwicker's loudnessmodel [J]. Acoustica, 1996,82 (2): 335-345.
  • 6MooreBCJ, GlasbergBR.Arevisedmodel of loudness perceptionapplied to cochlear hearing loss [J]. Hearing Research, 2004,188(1/2): 70-88.
  • 7Chalupper J, Fast H. Dynamic loudnessmodel (DLM) for normaland hearing-impaired listeners [J]. Acta Acoustica, 2002,88 (3):378-386.
  • 8Belin P, ZilboviciusM, Crozier S, et al.. Lateralization of speechand auditory temporal processing [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1998,10 (4): 536-540.
  • 9Wyss C, Boers F, Kawohl W, et al.. Spatiotemporal propertiesof auditory intensity processing in multisensor MEG [J]. Neuro-Image, 2014,102: 465-473.
  • 10Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, et al.. Right hemispheredominance of different mismatch negativities [J]. Electroencephalographyand Clinical Neurophysiology, 1991,78 (6): 466-479.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部