摘要
关于对外连带保证案件的法律适用,我国审判实践尚无统一的做法。本文以诉讼时效的法律适用为例,认为如果涉案保证经过审批的,其法律适用应尊重当事人的意思自治,未经审批的,则应以直接适用法为由适用我国内地法处理,而且,此种区分将导致在诉讼时效问题上法律适用的不同。
About the application of law when it concerns the prescription of action in foreign-related joint liability guarantee cases,there isn t a united way in domestic legal practice up till now.In order to live up to the goal of dealing with such cases with a united way,the author points out the court should deal with such cases separately according to whether or not the guarantee acting has been approved by the Chinese government.
出处
《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期16-20,153,共6页
Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
连带保证
法律适用
诉讼时效
joint liability guarantee
application of law
prescription of action