对我国刑事诉讼法第206条之质疑——兼谈审判监督程序审级制度的改革

The Oppugning on No. 206 of Criminal Law in China —Concurrently Discussing the Reform of the Trial Monitor System

我国刑事诉讼法第206条规定了再审程序的审级应同已生效的普通程序审级相一致。这给实际操作带来了困难,造成诉讼周期的相对延长、刑事诉讼的“N”审终审、国家司法资源的无谓浪费等不良后果。文章建议对我国刑诉法之206条予以修改,使审判监督程序非依赖于再审案件在普通程序中的终审审级,而实行“一审终审”制度。

No.206 of Criminal Law in China prescribes that the trial level of the retrial process should keep consistent with the efficient general process.It brings several difficulties in actual operation,and makes the lawsuit cycle comparatively longer ,the “N”trial final judgment of the criminal lawsuit and state judicial resource,ointlessly wasteful,etc.In this article,the author suggests that No.206 of Criminal Law in China need to amend,and the trial level of the retrial process should not keep consistent with the efficient general process,but implement “the first trial is the final”system.