摘要
本文就日本明治时期民法典论争及其与我国清末礼法之争进行评析和比较 ,着重分析研究了其间的差异及产生这种差异的内在原因 ,主要从四个方面进行了论述 :一、日本明治时期的民法典论争 ,简要介绍其产生发展的前后过程 ;二、日本民法典论争与清末礼法之争的相同点 ,分析两者之间存在的共同特点 ;三、日本民法典论争与清末礼法之争的不同点 ,分析两者之间存在的不同之处 ;四、对两者间异同的思考 。
This article makes analyses and comparison between the d ebates in th e codification of Japan's Meiji Civil Code and those concerning Li-Fa debates a t the end of China's Qing Dynasty with emphasis on the differences and the inner factors that lead to the differences. The article consists of four parts: first, a brief introduction of the production of the code and debates in the coding pr ocess; second, analyses of similarities between the debates and those concerning the Li-Fa debates; third, analyses of differences between them; and fourth, di s cussion about domestic and foreign factors that cause the similarities and diffe rences.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2004年第3期59-64,共6页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
日本
民法典论争
清末
礼法之争
Japan
debates in the codification of the Meiji Civil Code
end of the Qing Dynasty
Li-Fa debates