摘要
在人类已有的社会实践中,惩罚是一个极为普遍的现象。当前,围绕惩罚问题的争论也越来越多,其争论的焦点在于惩罚的正义与否的问题上。对惩罚正义问题的回答一般有两种理论:惩罚主义和功利主义。本文通过对康德式惩罚主义和边沁密尔式功利主义这两种理论传统意蕴以及它们紧张关系的揭示,来展现绝对的惩罚主义和完全的功利主义都不是保证惩罚正义的合适方案。本文最后旨在指出,惩罚的正义必须形成一种建基于多元的现实之上的多元的理论,从而达到惩罚主义和功利主义之间的一种平衡。
Punishment is an extremely universal phenomenon in social practice.Presently arguments on punishment are getting more and more,focusing on the justice of punishment.Generally there are two answers to the question:the retributive theory and utilitarianism.This paper points out that absolute retributive theory and utilitarianism are not the suitable ways to guarantee the justice of punishment,that the justice of punishment can only be realized by relying on multi-theories that are based on reality to reach a ...
出处
《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》
2008年第4期16-21,共6页
Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
关键词
惩罚
惩罚主义
功利主义
多元
punishment
retributive theory
utilitarianism
multi-theories