摘要
目的:探讨男性泌尿生殖道不同标本(尿道分泌物、前列腺液、精液)支原体检测结果的差异。方法:对初诊疑泌尿生殖道感染者412例,复查患者308例。分别取尿道分泌物、前列腺液、精液为标本进行支原体检测。结果:初诊412例中,尿道分泌物标本支原体阳性194例,占47.0%;前列腺液标本支原体阳性202例,占49.0%;精液标本支原体阳性214例,占51.9%;214例精液支原体阳性标本覆盖前列腺液标本阳性202例,覆盖尿道分泌物标本阳性194例。精液支原体阳性漏诊率为0,前列腺液漏诊率为5.6%,尿道分泌物漏诊率为9.3%。三个标本组两两间比较支原体阳性率及漏诊率无显著性差异。复查患者308例,尿道分泌物标本支原体阳性30例,占9.7%;前列腺液标本支原体阳性61例,占19.8%;精液标本支原体阳性77例,占25.0%。77例精液标本支原体阳性覆盖前列腺标本支原体阳性59例。漏诊2例;覆盖尿道分泌物标本支原体阳性30例;总阳性79例,精液标本支原体漏诊率2.5%(2/79),前列腺液标本支原体漏诊率22.8%(18/79),尿道分泌物标本支原体漏诊率62.0%(49/79)。前列腺液标本支原体阳性率与尿道分泌物标本支原体阳性率比较有显著性差异;精液标本支原体阳性率与前列腺液标本支原体阳性率比较无显著性差异;精液标本支原体阳性率与尿道分泌物标本支原体阳性率比较有显著性差异。标本组间两两比较漏诊率均有显著性差异。结论:精液标本覆盖面广,支原体培养标本应首选精液。
Objective:To investigate the distinction of mycoplasma detection in different sample collected from male genitourinary tract (urethral secretions, liquor prostaticus, ejaculum). Methods: Urethral secretions, liquor prostaticus and ejaculum were collected respectively from 412 people who were preliminary diagnosed genitourinary tract infector and 308 patients who recheck. And then the samples were undertaken mycoplasma detection. Results: Among the 412 examples of preliminary diagnosed infector, 194 samples ...
出处
《陕西医学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2008年第9期1219-1221,共3页
Shaanxi Medical Journal
基金
河南省医学科技创新人才工程基金资助(No20040057)