重审渤海建国史──兼评“依附”说、“白山”说、“叛乱”说

A Re-Examination of the Founding History of the Bohai State: A Critique of the Statements of Dependence,Baishan and Rebellion

渤海建国史由于受到新罗、日本等史料的影响，造成两《唐书》中《渤海传》与《■■传》的矛盾记述，并造成了渤海建国史研究中“依附”说、“白山”说以及“叛乱”说等误区。本文重新审读■■族史、契丹族史与渤海建国史，指出日本史料，尤其是新罗史料之误导，使渤海史研究走出误区，还渤海建国史以历史本来面貌。

Concerning the founding history of the Bohai (or Par hae) State, there are two contradictory accounts both in Jiu-Tang-Shu (the Old Edition of the History of Tang Dynasty) and Xin-Tang-Shu (The New Edition of the History of the Tang Dynasty). One is from 'the Account of Bohai', and the other from 'the Account of Mohe'. The disagreement came from the influence of the hist orical accounts of Silla and Japan and in turn resulted in such misreading as the statements of “dependence', “Baishan'(or White Mountain), “rebellion' and so on. This paper makes are-examination of the history of Mohe and Khitan as well as of the founding history of the Bohai State. Through clarifying the history of Bohai, the author makes the concerning study out of the misreading of the historical accounts from Silla and Japan, and makes the founding history of the Bohai State return to what was like actually.