论比例原则在有关征收的国际投资仲裁中的开创性适用被引量：15

下载PDF

导出

摘要在国际投资仲裁领域,比例原则已经得到了开创性适用,分析表明其将得到进一步扩大适用。比例原则是一个比非歧视原则要求更高的原则,甚至被认为是公平与公正待遇原则中包含的一个重要原则。在我国新一轮双边投资协定中大都规定公平与公正待遇原则及基本上都放弃了逐案审查权、国际投资仲裁中国际法得到越来越多适用的情况下,比例原则在有关征收的国际投资仲裁领域的适用应该引起我国学者与当局的关注和思考。

作者韩秀丽

机构地区厦门大学法学院

出处《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2008年第6期116-123,共8页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute

关键词比例原则国际投资仲裁开创性适用

分类号 D997.4 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1[2]See Jack J.Coe,Jr.＆ Noah Rubins.Regulatory Expropriation and the Tecmed Case:Context and Contributions,Todd Weiler.In-ternational Investment Law and Arbitration:Leading Cases From the ICSID,NAFTA,Bilateral Treaties and Cusuom'ry Internation'l Law.London:Cameron May,2005,597,624,653-56 ;"leading case"me'ns:(1)most strictly,a jtdicial precedent that first definitely settled an im-portant rule or principle of law and that has since been often and consistently followed t (2)less strictly,an important,often the most important,judicial precedent on a particular legal issue; or (3)loosely,a reported case that determines an issue being litigated.See Bryan A.Garner.牛津现代法律用语词典《A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage)(2)》,法律出版社2003年版,第513页.
2[3]Yves L.Fortier ＆ Stephen L.Drymer,Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment:I Know It When I See It,orCaveat Investor,ICSID Review,2004,19(2):324.
3[6]Tecmed v.Mexico,para.122.
4[8]参考了欧洲人权法院的以下判例:Matos e Silva.Lda.,and Others v.Portugal(http://hudoc.echr.coe.int);Mellacher and Others v.Austria(http://hudoc.echr.coe.int); Pressos Companía Naviera and Others v.Belgium(http://hudoc.echr.coe.int);James and Others(ht-tp://hudoc.echr.coe.int).参见Tecmed v.Mexico案注140,141,143,144.
5[10]P.Muchlinski,Multinational Enterprises and the Law[M],Oxford:Blackwell,1995,504; N Schrijver,Sovereignty over Natural Re-sources:Balancing Rights and Duties[M],Cambridge:CUP,1997,344-364.
6[13]Article 51(Proportionality) "Countermeasures must be commensurate with the injury suffered,taking into account the gravity of the internationally wrongful act and the fights in question." See Resolution adopted by the General Assembly.on the report of the Sixth Committee (A/56/589 and Corr.1).56/83.Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts.28 January 2002.http://lcil,law.cam.ac.uk/IL-心:《北大国际法与比较法评论(1)》,北京大学出版社2002年版,第242页.
7[14]See Teemed v.Mexico,para.120.
8[19]See www.lexisnexis.com.协定英文原文为:No Party may directly or indirectly nationalize or expropriate an investment of an investor of another Party in its territory or take a measure tantamount to nationalization or expropriation of such an investment("expropriation"),ex-cept:(a)for a public purpose;(b)on a non-discriminatory basis;(c)in accordance with due process of law and Article 1105(1); and(d)On payment of compensation in accordance with paragraphs 2 through 6.
9[21]See Brumarescu V.Romania,Eor.Ct.H.R.1999(33),882.
10[22]See James v.United Kingdom,Eur.Ct.H.R.(ser.A),1986(98),34.