期刊文献+

博弈论模型在解决水资源冲突上的运用 被引量:3

Solving water conflicts using game theoretic models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水资源短缺和水质恶化是当今众多发展中国家所面临的两个严重问题。与这两个问题有关的水资源管理通常涉及众多的利益相关者。这些利益相关者因为不同的兴趣和利益常常发生冲突。在缺乏水市场和专有财产权利时,冲突是不可避免的。博弈论是模仿和解决这类冲突的一种有效方法。以汉江流域水资源管理中所涉及的不同利益相关者的冲突为例,展示如何用非合作与合作博弈来模拟和解决水资源冲突。在本研究中,统计学和经济计量学的回归模型法用来构建博弈各方的效益函数,成本效益分析法来比较不同战略下的博弈结果。博弈模拟结果显示,非合作虽然可使某方赢利,但却使整体受损;相反,合作虽然可给某方带来损失,但是却给各方带来整体利益。所以,如果能够把合作所带来的部分净收益从赢利方转向损失方,以补足损失方的损失,博弈各方均能受益。此模拟方法及结果不仅可使水资源不同利益相关者受益,而且在水资源合理分配?水价制定?生态补偿等方面也可以为水资源管理部门提供决策支持。 Water quality degradation and water scarcity are two serious problems in developing countries. Water management related to these problems usually involves multi-stakeholders with contradictory interests. In the absence of market and exclusive property rights, conflicts among those multi-stakeholders are unavoidable. Game theory can be an appropriate approach to simulate and resolve such conflicts. In this paper, the conflicts of multiple water stakeholders involved in water management of the Hanjiang River ...
出处 《人民长江》 北大核心 2008年第23期8-13,138,共7页 Yangtze River
关键词 水资源管理 冲突 博弈论 模拟 成本效益 汉江 Water management conflicts game theory modelling and simulation the Hanjiang River cost-benefit analysis.
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1]Leete,R.,Donnay,F.,Kersemaekers,S.,Schoch,M.,& Shah,M.Global population and water,UNFPA report on Population and Development Strategies Series,2003.number 6.UNFPA:New York,
  • 2[2]Wei,S.K.& Gnauek,A.Game theoretic approaches to model water conflicts on a river basin scale.Modelling and Simulation of Ecosystems,2007.ed.A.Gnauck,Shaker Verlag:Aachen,pp.22~40.
  • 3[3]Wolf,A.T.Criteria for equitable allocations:The heart of international water conflict.Natural Resources Forum,1999,(23):3~30.
  • 4杨志峰,曾勇.跨边界区域水资源冲突与协调模型与应用(Ⅰ)模型体系[J].环境科学学报,2004,24(1):71-76. 被引量:31
  • 5[6]Giglio,R.J & Wrightington,R.Methods for apportioning the costs of a water resource project.Water Resoure.Res.,1972,(8):1133~1144.
  • 6[7]Dinar,A.& Howitt,R.E.Mechnisms for allocation of environmental control cost:Empirical test of acceptability and stability.Environ.Management,1997,(49):183~203.
  • 7[8]Hearty,J.P.& Dickinson,R.E.Methods for apportioning the costs of a water resource project.Water Resourc.Res.,1982,18(3):476~482.
  • 8[9]Young,H.P,Okada,N.& Heshimoto,T.Cost allocation in water resoarce development.Water Resourc.Res.,1982,18 (3):463~475.
  • 9[10]Lejano,R.P.& Davos,C.A.Cost allocation of multiagency water resource projects:Game theoretic approaches and case study.Water Resoure.Res.,1995,31(5):1387~1393.
  • 10[11]Wang,L.Z.,Fang,L.& Hipel,K.W.Water resource allocation:A cooperative game approach.Environ.Informaties 2003,2(1):11~22.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Wu Peilin 1,2 & Lu Qi 2 1. Shandong University of Technology, Zibo Shandong 255049, China,2. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.Floating Population Increase and Its Influence on the Urban Population Situation:A Case Study in Beijing[J].Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment,2005,3(1):27-35. 被引量:1
  • 2Bonnie G. Colby, D' estree T P. Economic evaluation of mechanisms to resolve water conflicts [J]. Water Resources Development,2000,16(2) : 154-159.
  • 3Mostert Erik. A framework for conflict resolution [J]. Water International, 1998,23(4):206-215.
  • 4Cai Ximing D C, McKonney L S, Lasdon. Piece-by-piece approach to solving large nonlinear water resources management models[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2001,127(6) :363-368.
  • 5Umesh C, Chaube. Water conflict resolution in the Gangs-Brahmaputra basin [ J ]. Water Resources Development, 1990,6(2) :79-85.
  • 6Kaufman E, J, Oppenheimer, A, Wolf T. Transboundary fresh water disputes and conflict resolution : planning an integrated approach [J]. Water International, 1997,22(1) :37-48.
  • 7Lejano R P, Climis A. Davos. Cost allocation of multiageney water resource projects: game theoretic approaches and case study [ J].Water Resources Research, 1995, 31(5) : 1387-1393.
  • 8Hearty J P, Dickinson R E. Methods for apportioning the costs of a water resource project [J]. Water Resources Research, 1982,18(3) :476-482.
  • 9Tisdell J G, Harrison S R. Estimating an optimal distribution of water entitlements [J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(12) :3111-3117.
  • 10Becker Nir, Easter K W, Water diversion from the great lakes: is a cooperative approach possible?[J]. Water Resources Development, 1997,13(1) :53-65.

共引文献72

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部